details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-482.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n094.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	11.0272 seconds
cpu usage	40.1302
user time	38.5451
system time	1.58517
max virtual memory	8.0224584E7
max residence set size	3979016.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

39.76/10.93 YES 39.76/10.94 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 39.76/10.94 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (0) QTRS 39.76/10.94 (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 39.76/10.94 (2) QTRS 39.76/10.94 (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 1 ms] 39.76/10.94 (4) QDP 39.76/10.94 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 237 ms] 39.76/10.94 (6) QDP 39.76/10.94 (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 206 ms] 39.76/10.94 (8) QDP 39.76/10.94 (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 39.76/10.94 (10) TRUE 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (0) 39.76/10.94 Obligation: 39.76/10.94 Q restricted rewrite system: 39.76/10.94 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 a(a(x1)) -> a(b(c(x1))) 39.76/10.94 c(a(x1)) -> x1 39.76/10.94 c(b(x1)) -> a(a(c(x1))) 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 Q is empty. 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) 39.76/10.94 We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (2) 39.76/10.94 Obligation: 39.76/10.94 Q restricted rewrite system: 39.76/10.94 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 a(a(x1)) -> c(b(a(x1))) 39.76/10.94 a(c(x1)) -> x1 39.76/10.94 b(c(x1)) -> c(a(a(x1))) 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 Q is empty. 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 39.76/10.94 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (4) 39.76/10.94 Obligation: 39.76/10.94 Q DP problem: 39.76/10.94 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 A(a(x1)) -> B(a(x1)) 39.76/10.94 B(c(x1)) -> A(a(x1)) 39.76/10.94 B(c(x1)) -> A(x1) 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 a(a(x1)) -> c(b(a(x1))) 39.76/10.94 a(c(x1)) -> x1 39.76/10.94 b(c(x1)) -> c(a(a(x1))) 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 Q is empty. 39.76/10.94 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 39.76/10.94 ---------------------------------------- 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 39.76/10.94 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 B(c(x1)) -> A(x1) 39.76/10.94 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 39.76/10.94 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic integers [ARCTIC,STERNAGEL_THIEMANN_RTA14]: 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 <<< 39.76/10.94 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-1A, -1A, -I]] * x_1 39.76/10.94 >>> 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 <<< 39.76/10.94 POL(a(x_1)) = [[0A], [1A], [-1A]] + [[-1A, -1A, -1A], [-I, 1A, -1A], [-I, -1A, -I]] * x_1 39.76/10.94 >>> 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 <<< 39.76/10.94 POL(B(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-1A, -1A, 1A]] * x_1 39.76/10.94 >>> 39.76/10.94 39.76/10.94 <<< 39.76/10.94 POL(c(x_1)) = [[0A], [-1A], [0A]] + [[-1A, -1A, -1A], [1A, -1A, 1A], [-1A, -1A, -1A]] * x_1 39.76/10.94 >>> popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29