details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	size-12-alpha-3-num-288.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n111.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_07_size12

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	10.9027 seconds
cpu usage	39.0624
user time	37.5336
system time	1.52883
max virtual memory	8.0747496E7
max residence set size	4148020.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

38.68/10.84 YES 38.96/10.85 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 38.96/10.85 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (0) QTRS 38.96/10.85 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 14 ms] 38.96/10.85 (2) QDP 38.96/10.85 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 38.96/10.85 (4) QDP 38.96/10.85 (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 38.96/10.85 (6) QDP 38.96/10.85 (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 38.96/10.85 (8) TRUE 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (0) 38.96/10.85 Obligation: 38.96/10.85 Q restricted rewrite system: 38.96/10.85 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 a(x1) -> x1 38.96/10.85 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) 38.96/10.85 b(x1) -> a(x1) 38.96/10.85 c(c(x1)) -> x1 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 Q is empty. 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 38.96/10.85 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (2) 38.96/10.85 Obligation: 38.96/10.85 Q DP problem: 38.96/10.85 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> C(b(c(b(a(x1))))) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> B(c(b(a(x1)))) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> C(b(a(x1))) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> B(a(x1)) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 B(x1) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 a(x1) -> x1 38.96/10.85 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) 38.96/10.85 b(x1) -> a(x1) 38.96/10.85 c(c(x1)) -> x1 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 Q is empty. 38.96/10.85 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 38.96/10.85 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (4) 38.96/10.85 Obligation: 38.96/10.85 Q DP problem: 38.96/10.85 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> B(c(b(a(x1)))) 38.96/10.85 B(x1) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> B(a(x1)) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 a(x1) -> x1 38.96/10.85 a(b(x1)) -> c(b(c(b(a(x1))))) 38.96/10.85 b(x1) -> a(x1) 38.96/10.85 c(c(x1)) -> x1 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 Q is empty. 38.96/10.85 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 38.96/10.85 ---------------------------------------- 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) 38.96/10.85 We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 B(x1) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 A(b(x1)) -> A(x1) 38.96/10.85 The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. 38.96/10.85 Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic integers [ARCTIC,STERNAGEL_THIEMANN_RTA14]: 38.96/10.85 38.96/10.85 <<< 38.96/10.85 POL(A(x_1)) = [[0A]] + [[-I, -I, -1A]] * x_1 38.96/10.85 >>> popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29