Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29 pair #432291997
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
z103.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n061.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Zantema_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
8.83918 seconds
cpu usage
30.8021
user time
29.5458
system time
1.25623
max virtual memory
4.1540224E7
max residence set size
3903804.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
YES
output
30.02/8.63 YES 30.37/8.78 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 30.37/8.78 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (0) QTRS 30.37/8.78 (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 31 ms] 30.37/8.78 (2) QDP 30.37/8.78 (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 30.37/8.78 (4) QDP 30.37/8.78 (5) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 25 ms] 30.37/8.78 (6) QDP 30.37/8.78 (7) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 16 ms] 30.37/8.78 (8) QDP 30.37/8.78 (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 30.37/8.78 (10) TRUE 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (0) 30.37/8.78 Obligation: 30.37/8.78 Q restricted rewrite system: 30.37/8.78 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 a(d(x1)) -> d(b(x1)) 30.37/8.78 a(x1) -> b(b(b(x1))) 30.37/8.78 b(d(b(x1))) -> a(c(x1)) 30.37/8.78 c(x1) -> d(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Q is empty. 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) 30.37/8.78 Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (2) 30.37/8.78 Obligation: 30.37/8.78 Q DP problem: 30.37/8.78 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 A(d(x1)) -> B(x1) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(b(b(x1))) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(b(x1)) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(x1) 30.37/8.78 B(d(b(x1))) -> A(c(x1)) 30.37/8.78 B(d(b(x1))) -> C(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 a(d(x1)) -> d(b(x1)) 30.37/8.78 a(x1) -> b(b(b(x1))) 30.37/8.78 b(d(b(x1))) -> a(c(x1)) 30.37/8.78 c(x1) -> d(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Q is empty. 30.37/8.78 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) 30.37/8.78 The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (4) 30.37/8.78 Obligation: 30.37/8.78 Q DP problem: 30.37/8.78 The TRS P consists of the following rules: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 B(d(b(x1))) -> A(c(x1)) 30.37/8.78 A(d(x1)) -> B(x1) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(b(b(x1))) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(b(x1)) 30.37/8.78 A(x1) -> B(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 a(d(x1)) -> d(b(x1)) 30.37/8.78 a(x1) -> b(b(b(x1))) 30.37/8.78 b(d(b(x1))) -> a(c(x1)) 30.37/8.78 c(x1) -> d(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Q is empty. 30.37/8.78 We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. 30.37/8.78 ---------------------------------------- 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 (5) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT) 30.37/8.78 By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented. 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Strictly oriented dependency pairs: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 A(d(x1)) -> B(x1) 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: 30.37/8.78 30.37/8.78 POL(A(x_1)) = x_1
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to SRS_Standard 2019-03-29 03.29