Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11 pair #433307785
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
wiehe02.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n181.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
AProVE_07
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
291.59 seconds
cpu usage
315.952
user time
313.374
system time
2.57761
max virtual memory
1.8279384E7
max residence set size
5705500.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^2), ?)
output
315.82/291.54 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^2), ?) 315.82/291.55 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 315.82/291.55 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, INF). 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 (0) CpxTRS 315.82/291.55 (1) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (2) CpxTRS 315.82/291.55 (3) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (4) typed CpxTrs 315.82/291.55 (5) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (6) typed CpxTrs 315.82/291.55 (7) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 293 ms] 315.82/291.55 (8) BEST 315.82/291.55 (9) proven lower bound 315.82/291.55 (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 315.82/291.55 (12) typed CpxTrs 315.82/291.55 (13) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 56 ms] 315.82/291.55 (14) typed CpxTrs 315.82/291.55 (15) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 395 ms] 315.82/291.55 (16) BEST 315.82/291.55 (17) proven lower bound 315.82/291.55 (18) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (19) BOUNDS(n^2, INF) 315.82/291.55 (20) typed CpxTrs 315.82/291.55 (21) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 315.82/291.55 (22) BOUNDS(1, INF) 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 ---------------------------------------- 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 (0) 315.82/291.55 Obligation: 315.82/291.55 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, INF). 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 app(nil, k) -> k 315.82/291.55 app(l, nil) -> l 315.82/291.55 app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k)) 315.82/291.55 sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil) 315.82/291.55 sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l)) 315.82/291.55 sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k))))) 315.82/291.55 plus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y))))) 315.82/291.55 plus(s(x), x) -> plus(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x)) 315.82/291.55 plus(zero, y) -> y 315.82/291.55 plus(id(x), s(y)) -> s(plus(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) 315.82/291.55 id(x) -> x 315.82/291.55 if(true, x, y) -> x 315.82/291.55 if(false, x, y) -> y 315.82/291.55 not(x) -> if(x, false, true) 315.82/291.55 gt(s(x), zero) -> true 315.82/291.55 gt(zero, y) -> false 315.82/291.55 gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 S is empty. 315.82/291.55 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 315.82/291.55 ---------------------------------------- 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 (1) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) 315.82/291.55 Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol. 315.82/291.55 ---------------------------------------- 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 (2) 315.82/291.55 Obligation: 315.82/291.55 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, INF). 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 app(nil, k) -> k 315.82/291.55 app(l, nil) -> l 315.82/291.55 app(cons(x, l), k) -> cons(x, app(l, k)) 315.82/291.55 sum(cons(x, nil)) -> cons(x, nil) 315.82/291.55 sum(cons(x, cons(y, l))) -> sum(cons(plus(x, y), l)) 315.82/291.55 sum(app(l, cons(x, cons(y, k)))) -> sum(app(l, sum(cons(x, cons(y, k))))) 315.82/291.55 plus(s(x), s(y)) -> s(s(plus(if(gt(x, y), x, y), if(not(gt(x, y)), id(x), id(y))))) 315.82/291.55 plus(s(x), x) -> plus(if(gt(x, x), id(x), id(x)), s(x)) 315.82/291.55 plus(zero, y) -> y 315.82/291.55 plus(id(x), s(y)) -> s(plus(x, if(gt(s(y), y), y, s(y)))) 315.82/291.55 id(x) -> x 315.82/291.55 if(true, x, y) -> x 315.82/291.55 if(false, x, y) -> y 315.82/291.55 not(x) -> if(x, false, true) 315.82/291.55 gt(s(x), zero) -> true 315.82/291.55 gt(zero, y) -> false 315.82/291.55 gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 S is empty. 315.82/291.55 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 315.82/291.55 ---------------------------------------- 315.82/291.55 315.82/291.55 (3) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) 315.82/291.55 Infered types. 315.82/291.55 ---------------------------------------- 315.82/291.55
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11