Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11 pair #433307819

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	gmnp.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n109.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Rubio_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	2.71971 seconds
cpu usage	6.94064
user time	6.53158
system time	0.409058
max virtual memory	1.8279384E7
max residence set size	1124980.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

6.42/2.60	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))
6.75/2.67	proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
6.75/2.67	# AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1).
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(0) CpxTRS
6.75/2.67	(1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	(2) CpxTRS
6.75/2.67	    (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	    (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1)
6.75/2.67	(5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	(6) CpxTRS
6.75/2.67	    (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	    (8) typed CpxTrs
6.75/2.67	    (9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	    (10) typed CpxTrs
6.75/2.67	    (11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 432 ms]
6.75/2.67	    (12) proven lower bound
6.75/2.67	    (13) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms]
6.75/2.67	    (14) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(0)
6.75/2.67	Obligation:
6.75/2.67	The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1).
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(c(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(c(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(a)) -> f(d(b))
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(d(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(b)) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   e(g(X)) -> e(X)
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	S is empty.
6.75/2.67	Rewrite Strategy: FULL
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID))
6.75/2.67	transformed relative TRS to TRS
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(2)
6.75/2.67	Obligation:
6.75/2.67	The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1).
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(c(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(c(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(a)) -> f(d(b))
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(d(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(b)) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   e(g(X)) -> e(X)
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	S is empty.
6.75/2.67	Rewrite Strategy: FULL
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED)
6.75/2.67	A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 3. 
6.75/2.67	The certificate found is represented by the following graph.
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	"[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
6.75/2.67	{(1,2,[f_1|0, e_1|0, a|1, c_1|1, d_1|1, b|1, g_1|1, e_1|1, a|2, b|2, b|3]), (1,3,[f_1|1]), (1,5,[f_1|1]), (1,7,[f_1|1]), (1,9,[f_1|2]), (2,2,[a|0, c_1|0, d_1|0, b|0, g_1|0]), (3,4,[c_1|1]), (4,2,[a|1]), (5,6,[d_1|1]), (6,2,[a|1]), (7,8,[d_1|1]), (8,2,[b|1]), (9,10,[d_1|2]), (10,2,[b|2])}"
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(4)
6.75/2.67	BOUNDS(1, n^1)
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(5) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID))
6.75/2.67	Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.
6.75/2.67	----------------------------------------
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	(6)
6.75/2.67	Obligation:
6.75/2.67	The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	The TRS R consists of the following rules:
6.75/2.67	
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(c(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(c(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(a)) -> f(d(b))
6.75/2.67	   f(a) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   f(d(X)) -> X
6.75/2.67	   f(c(b)) -> f(d(a))
6.75/2.67	   e(g(X)) -> e(X)
6.75/2.67

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11