Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11 pair #433308544
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
z27.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n065.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Zantema_05
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
291.684 seconds
cpu usage
643.001
user time
635.861
system time
7.1405
max virtual memory
1.9159772E7
max residence set size
9957140.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
642.74/291.62 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) 642.92/291.63 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 642.92/291.63 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (0) CpxTRS 642.92/291.63 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 642.92/291.63 (2) TRS for Loop Detection 642.92/291.63 (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 642.92/291.63 (4) BEST 642.92/291.63 (5) proven lower bound 642.92/291.63 (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 642.92/291.63 (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 642.92/291.63 (8) TRS for Loop Detection 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (0) 642.92/291.63 Obligation: 642.92/291.63 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 f(0, 1, x) -> f(g(x), g(x), x) 642.92/291.63 f(g(x), y, z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, g(y), z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, y, g(z)) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 S is empty. 642.92/291.63 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 642.92/291.63 Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (2) 642.92/291.63 Obligation: 642.92/291.63 Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 f(0, 1, x) -> f(g(x), g(x), x) 642.92/291.63 f(g(x), y, z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, g(y), z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, y, g(z)) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 S is empty. 642.92/291.63 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 642.92/291.63 The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The rewrite sequence 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 f(g(x), y, z) ->^+ g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [0]. 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The pumping substitution is [x / g(x)]. 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The result substitution is [ ]. 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (4) 642.92/291.63 Complex Obligation (BEST) 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (5) 642.92/291.63 Obligation: 642.92/291.63 Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 f(0, 1, x) -> f(g(x), g(x), x) 642.92/291.63 f(g(x), y, z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, g(y), z) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 f(x, y, g(z)) -> g(f(x, y, z)) 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 S is empty. 642.92/291.63 Rewrite Strategy: FULL 642.92/291.63 ---------------------------------------- 642.92/291.63 642.92/291.63 (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runtime_Complexity_Full_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.11
