Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runtime_Complexity_Innermost_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.40 pair #433313661
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
z17.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n182.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Zantema_05
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
292.39 seconds
cpu usage
1079.77
user time
1057.34
system time
22.4331
max virtual memory
5.573554E7
max residence set size
1.5046568E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
1076.93/291.64 WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) 1079.45/292.32 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 1079.45/292.32 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (0) CpxTRS 1079.45/292.32 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 1079.45/292.32 (2) TRS for Loop Detection 1079.45/292.32 (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] 1079.45/292.32 (4) BEST 1079.45/292.32 (5) proven lower bound 1079.45/292.32 (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] 1079.45/292.32 (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) 1079.45/292.32 (8) TRS for Loop Detection 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (0) 1079.45/292.32 Obligation: 1079.45/292.32 The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 f(x, a(b(y))) -> f(c(d(x)), y) 1079.45/292.32 f(c(x), y) -> f(x, a(y)) 1079.45/292.32 f(d(x), y) -> f(x, b(y)) 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 S is empty. 1079.45/292.32 Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 1079.45/292.32 Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (2) 1079.45/292.32 Obligation: 1079.45/292.32 Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 f(x, a(b(y))) -> f(c(d(x)), y) 1079.45/292.32 f(c(x), y) -> f(x, a(y)) 1079.45/292.32 f(d(x), y) -> f(x, b(y)) 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 S is empty. 1079.45/292.32 Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (3) DecreasingLoopProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) 1079.45/292.32 The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Omega(n^1): 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The rewrite sequence 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 f(c(x), y) ->^+ f(x, a(y)) 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position []. 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The pumping substitution is [x / c(x)]. 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The result substitution is [y / a(y)]. 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (4) 1079.45/292.32 Complex Obligation (BEST) 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (5) 1079.45/292.32 Obligation: 1079.45/292.32 Proved the lower bound n^1 for the following obligation: 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 f(x, a(b(y))) -> f(c(d(x)), y) 1079.45/292.32 f(c(x), y) -> f(x, a(y)) 1079.45/292.32 f(d(x), y) -> f(x, b(y)) 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 S is empty. 1079.45/292.32 Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32 1079.45/292.32 (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof (FINISHED) 1079.45/292.32 Propagated lower bound. 1079.45/292.32 ---------------------------------------- 1079.45/292.32
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runtime_Complexity_Innermost_Rewriting 2019-04-01 06.40