details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex4_7_37_Bor03.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n074.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Strategy_outermost_added_08

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	1.38776 seconds
cpu usage	3.35026
user time	3.21713
system time	0.13313
max virtual memory	1.8275288E7
max residence set size	223820.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	NO

output

3.26/1.34 NO 3.26/1.35 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml 3.26/1.35 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 Outermost Termination of the given OTRS could be disproven: 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 (0) OTRS 3.26/1.35 (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 43 ms] 3.26/1.35 (2) NO 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 ---------------------------------------- 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 (0) 3.26/1.35 Obligation: 3.26/1.35 Term rewrite system R: 3.26/1.35 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) 3.26/1.35 sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X 3.26/1.35 sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, XS) 3.26/1.35 minus(X, 0) -> 0 3.26/1.35 minus(s(X), s(Y)) -> minus(X, Y) 3.26/1.35 quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 3.26/1.35 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) 3.26/1.35 zWquot(XS, nil) -> nil 3.26/1.35 zWquot(nil, XS) -> nil 3.26/1.35 zWquot(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) -> cons(quot(X, Y), zWquot(XS, YS)) 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 Outermost Strategy. 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 ---------------------------------------- 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 (1) OutermostNonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) 3.26/1.35 Term rewrite system R: 3.26/1.35 The TRS R consists of the following rules: 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) 3.26/1.35 sel(0, cons(X, XS)) -> X 3.26/1.35 sel(s(N), cons(X, XS)) -> sel(N, XS) 3.26/1.35 minus(X, 0) -> 0 3.26/1.35 minus(s(X), s(Y)) -> minus(X, Y) 3.26/1.35 quot(0, s(Y)) -> 0 3.26/1.35 quot(s(X), s(Y)) -> s(quot(minus(X, Y), s(Y))) 3.26/1.35 zWquot(XS, nil) -> nil 3.26/1.35 zWquot(nil, XS) -> nil 3.26/1.35 zWquot(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS)) -> cons(quot(X, Y), zWquot(XS, YS)) 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 Outermost Strategy. 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 ---------- Loop: ---------- 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 from(X) -> cons(X, from(s(X))) with rule from(X') -> cons(X', from(s(X'))) at position [] and matcher [X' / X] 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 Now an instance of the first term with Matcher [X / s(X)] occurs in the last term at position [1]. 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 Context: cons(X, []) 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 We used [THIEMANN_LOOPS_UNDER_STRATEGIES] to show that this Loop is an Outermost-Loop. 3.26/1.35 ---------------------------------------- 3.26/1.35 3.26/1.35 (2) 3.26/1.35 NO 3.34/1.38 EOF popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS_Outermost 2019-04-01 06.45