Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Logic_Programming 2019-04-02 08.22 pair #434324657
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
mergesort.pl
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n090.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
lpexamples
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
3.93424 seconds
cpu usage
11.8176
user time
11.1503
system time
0.667297
max virtual memory
2.0611804E7
max residence set size
1164760.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
YES
output
11.31/3.80 YES 11.64/3.85 proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.pl 11.64/3.85 # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 Left Termination of the query pattern 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 mergesort(g,a) 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven: 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 (0) Prolog 11.64/3.85 (1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (2) TRIPLES 11.64/3.85 (3) TriplesToPiDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (4) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (6) AND 11.64/3.85 (7) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (8) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (9) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (10) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (11) QDP 11.64/3.85 (12) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (13) YES 11.64/3.85 (14) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (15) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (16) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (17) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (18) QDP 11.64/3.85 (19) QDPSizeChangeProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (20) YES 11.64/3.85 (21) PiDP 11.64/3.85 (22) PiDPToQDPProof [SOUND, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (23) QDP 11.64/3.85 (24) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (25) QDP 11.64/3.85 (26) QDPQMonotonicMRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 50 ms] 11.64/3.85 (27) QDP 11.64/3.85 (28) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (29) QDP 11.64/3.85 (30) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (31) QDP 11.64/3.85 (32) QReductionProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (33) QDP 11.64/3.85 (34) QDPQMonotonicMRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (35) QDP 11.64/3.85 (36) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] 11.64/3.85 (37) TRUE 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 ---------------------------------------- 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 (0) 11.64/3.85 Obligation: 11.64/3.85 Clauses: 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 mergesort([], []). 11.64/3.85 mergesort(.(X, []), .(X, [])). 11.64/3.85 mergesort(.(X, .(Y, Xs)), Ys) :- ','(split(.(X, .(Y, Xs)), X1s, X2s), ','(mergesort(X1s, Y1s), ','(mergesort(X2s, Y2s), merge(Y1s, Y2s, Ys)))). 11.64/3.85 split([], [], []). 11.64/3.85 split(.(X, Xs), .(X, Ys), Zs) :- split(Xs, Zs, Ys). 11.64/3.85 merge([], Xs, Xs). 11.64/3.85 merge(Xs, [], Xs). 11.64/3.85 merge(.(X, Xs), .(Y, Ys), .(X, Zs)) :- ','(=(X, Y), merge(.(X, Xs), Ys, Zs)). 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 Query: mergesort(g,a) 11.64/3.85 ---------------------------------------- 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 (1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND) 11.64/3.85 Built DT problem from termination graph DT10. 11.64/3.85 11.64/3.85 { 11.64/3.85 "root": 7, 11.64/3.85 "program": { 11.64/3.85 "directives": [], 11.64/3.85 "clauses": [ 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(mergesort ([]) ([]))", 11.64/3.85 null 11.64/3.85 ], 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(mergesort (. X ([])) (. X ([])))", 11.64/3.85 null 11.64/3.85 ], 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(mergesort (. X (. Y Xs)) Ys)", 11.64/3.85 "(',' (split (. X (. Y Xs)) X1s X2s) (',' (mergesort X1s Y1s) (',' (mergesort X2s Y2s) (merge Y1s Y2s Ys))))" 11.64/3.85 ], 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(split ([]) ([]) ([]))", 11.64/3.85 null 11.64/3.85 ], 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(split (. X Xs) (. X Ys) Zs)", 11.64/3.85 "(split Xs Zs Ys)" 11.64/3.85 ], 11.64/3.85 [ 11.64/3.85 "(merge ([]) Xs Xs)",
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Logic_Programming 2019-04-02 08.22