Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
TRS Standard pair #487072018
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex24_GM04.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n192.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Strategy_removed_CSR_05
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
2.65284 seconds
cpu usage
4.2548
user time
4.0668
system time
0.187996
max virtual memory
1.841096E7
max residence set size
300708.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
NO
output
NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QDP (3) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) NonTerminationLoopProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] (6) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(X, g(X), Y) -> f(Y, Y, Y) g(b) -> c b -> c Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: F(X, g(X), Y) -> F(Y, Y, Y) The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(X, g(X), Y) -> f(Y, Y, Y) g(b) -> c b -> c Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) TransformationProof (EQUIVALENT) By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule F(X, g(X), Y) -> F(Y, Y, Y) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]: (F(x0, g(x0), g(y_1)) -> F(g(y_1), g(y_1), g(y_1)),F(x0, g(x0), g(y_1)) -> F(g(y_1), g(y_1), g(y_1))) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: F(x0, g(x0), g(y_1)) -> F(g(y_1), g(y_1), g(y_1)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(X, g(X), Y) -> f(Y, Y, Y) g(b) -> c b -> c Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) NonTerminationLoopProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [FROCOS05] to show that the DP problem is infinite. Found a loop by narrowing to the left: s = F(g(b), g(b), g(y_1)) evaluates to t =F(g(y_1), g(y_1), g(y_1)) Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions: * Matcher: [ ] * Semiunifier: [y_1 / b] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rewriting sequence F(g(b), g(b), g(b)) -> F(g(b), g(c), g(b)) with rule b -> c at position [1,0] and matcher [ ] F(g(b), g(c), g(b)) -> F(c, g(c), g(b)) with rule g(b) -> c at position [0] and matcher [ ] F(c, g(c), g(b)) -> F(g(b), g(b), g(b)) with rule F(x0, g(x0), g(y_1)) -> F(g(y_1), g(y_1), g(y_1)) Now applying the matcher to the start term leads to a term which is equal to the last term in the rewriting sequence
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to TRS Standard