details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	6.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n070.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Secret_06_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	10.7719 seconds
cpu usage	18.2363
user time	17.7448
system time	0.491525
max virtual memory	1.8487736E7
max residence set size	739652.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 20 ms] (2) QDP (3) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 3 ms] (8) QDP (9) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) QDP (13) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 41 ms] (14) QDP (15) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) QDP (17) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) QDP (19) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (20) QDP (21) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 46 ms] (22) QDP (23) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 19 ms] (24) QDP (25) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (26) QDP (27) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 22 ms] (28) QDP (29) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (30) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(x, y) -> c(a(c(y), a(0, x))) a(y, x) -> y a(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> b(a(c(b(0, y)), x), 0) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(x, y) -> A(c(y), a(0, x)) B(x, y) -> A(0, x) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> B(a(c(b(0, y)), x), 0) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> A(c(b(0, y)), x) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> B(0, y) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(x, y) -> c(a(c(y), a(0, x))) a(y, x) -> y a(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> b(a(c(b(0, y)), x), 0) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) TransformationProof (EQUIVALENT) By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule B(x, y) -> A(c(y), a(0, x)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]: (B(y_3, 0) -> A(c(0), a(0, y_3)),B(y_3, 0) -> A(c(0), a(0, y_3))) (B(0, y_0) -> A(c(y_0), a(0, 0)),B(0, y_0) -> A(c(y_0), a(0, 0))) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(x, y) -> A(0, x) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> B(a(c(b(0, y)), x), 0) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> A(c(b(0, y)), x) A(y, c(b(a(0, x), 0))) -> B(0, y) B(y_3, 0) -> A(c(0), a(0, y_3)) B(0, y_0) -> A(c(y_0), a(0, 0)) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard