details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	gen-28.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n191.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Secret_06_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	13.9735 seconds
cpu usage	30.1269
user time	28.5271
system time	1.59976
max virtual memory	1.8509396E7
max residence set size	4230700.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 21 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 470 ms] (6) QDP (7) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QDP (9) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) QDP (13) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (14) QDP (15) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (16) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(y, z) -> f(c(c(y, z, z), a, a)) b(b(z, y), a) -> z c(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> c(f(b(x, z)), c(z, y, a), a) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(y, z) -> C(c(y, z, z), a, a) B(y, z) -> C(y, z, z) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> C(f(b(x, z)), c(z, y, a), a) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> B(x, z) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> C(z, y, a) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(y, z) -> f(c(c(y, z, z), a, a)) b(b(z, y), a) -> z c(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> c(f(b(x, z)), c(z, y, a), a) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: B(y, z) -> C(y, z, z) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> C(f(b(x, z)), c(z, y, a), a) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> B(x, z) C(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> C(z, y, a) The TRS R consists of the following rules: b(y, z) -> f(c(c(y, z, z), a, a)) b(b(z, y), a) -> z c(f(z), f(c(a, x, a)), y) -> c(f(b(x, z)), c(z, y, a), a) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. B(y, z) -> C(y, z, z) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [MATRO] with arctic natural numbers [ARCTIC]: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard