details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	jwmatchb1.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n180.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	14.0949 seconds
cpu usage	30.1062
user time	28.5323
system time	1.57392
max virtual memory	1.87691E7
max residence set size	4220064.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) Overlay + Local Confluence [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 5 ms] (4) QDP (5) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QDP (9) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 367 ms] (10) QDP (11) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT) The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a)) The set Q consists of the following terms: h(f(x0, x1)) ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: H(f(x, y)) -> H(h(x)) H(f(x, y)) -> H(x) The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a)) The set Q consists of the following terms: h(f(x0, x1)) We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) TransformationProof (EQUIVALENT) By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule H(f(x, y)) -> H(h(x)) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]: (H(f(f(x0, x1), y1)) -> H(f(x1, f(h(h(x0)), a))),H(f(f(x0, x1), y1)) -> H(f(x1, f(h(h(x0)), a)))) ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: H(f(x, y)) -> H(x) H(f(f(x0, x1), y1)) -> H(f(x1, f(h(h(x0)), a))) The TRS R consists of the following rules: h(f(x, y)) -> f(y, f(h(h(x)), a)) The set Q consists of the following terms: h(f(x0, x1)) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard