details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	27131.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n145.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	ICFP_2010

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	15.8761 seconds
cpu usage	59.2439
user time	56.5224
system time	2.72156
max virtual memory	3.891898E7
max residence set size	6049380.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	YES

output

YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRS Reverse [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRoofMatchBoundsTAProof [EQUIVALENT, 1893 ms] (4) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(1(2(1(x1)))) -> 1(2(1(1(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRS Reverse (EQUIVALENT) We applied the QTRS Reverse Processor [REVERSE]. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 1(2(1(0(x1)))) -> 2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(2(1(0(1(1(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRoofMatchBoundsTAProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R could be shown to be Match-Bounded [TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] by 3. Therefore it terminates. The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness is represented by: final states : [0, 1, 2] transitions: 10(0) -> 0 10(1) -> 0 10(2) -> 0 20(0) -> 1 20(1) -> 1 20(2) -> 1 00(0) -> 2 00(1) -> 2 00(2) -> 2 11(0) -> 10 21(10) -> 9 11(9) -> 8 11(8) -> 7 01(7) -> 6 11(6) -> 3 21(3) -> 5 01(5) -> 4 11(4) -> 3 21(3) -> 0 11(1) -> 10 11(2) -> 10 11(7) -> 10 11(5) -> 10 12(7) -> 18 22(18) -> 17 12(17) -> 16 12(16) -> 15 02(15) -> 14 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Standard