details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	05.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n145.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Gebhardt_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	7.34378 seconds
cpu usage	25.948
user time	24.8992
system time	1.04878
max virtual memory	5.9427484E7
max residence set size	3121240.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	NO

output

NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) NonTerminationProof [COMPLETE, 1333 ms] (2) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(0(1(x1)))) 1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0(0(1(0(x1)))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) NonTerminationProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite. Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure: "0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 2"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 by OverlapClosure OC 2"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 2"0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)""1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -> 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 -> 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 0 1 -> 0 1 0 1 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 3"1 0 0 1 0 1 -> 0 0 0 0 1 0 by OverlapClosure OC 2"1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)""""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""1 0 0 1 -> 0 0 1 0 by original rule (OC 1)"""0 0 0 0 -> 0 1 0 1 by original rule (OC 1)" ---------------------------------------- (2) NO popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Standard