Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103064
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
212026.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n141.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
ICFP_2010
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
291.716 seconds
cpu usage
1099.97
user time
1089.43
system time
10.5384
max virtual memory
1.8789272E7
max residence set size
1.4779748E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))
output
WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 43 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxTRS (7) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 141 ms] (8) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(0(0(x1))) -> 0(0(1(0(1(x1))))) 0(2(0(x1))) -> 0(0(2(1(1(x1))))) 0(3(2(x1))) -> 2(1(3(0(x1)))) 0(4(2(x1))) -> 4(1(1(1(0(2(x1)))))) 3(0(4(x1))) -> 0(1(3(4(1(x1))))) 3(2(0(x1))) -> 0(2(1(3(x1)))) 3(2(0(x1))) -> 3(0(2(1(x1)))) 3(2(0(x1))) -> 0(1(2(1(3(x1))))) 3(2(0(x1))) -> 3(0(1(2(1(4(x1)))))) 3(2(4(x1))) -> 1(2(1(3(3(4(x1)))))) 3(2(4(x1))) -> 4(1(2(1(1(3(x1)))))) 3(2(5(x1))) -> 1(3(5(2(x1)))) 3(2(5(x1))) -> 3(1(4(5(2(x1))))) 3(2(5(x1))) -> 1(1(3(3(5(2(x1)))))) 3(2(5(x1))) -> 1(3(4(5(4(2(x1)))))) 3(5(0(x1))) -> 3(1(0(5(1(1(x1)))))) 5(0(2(x1))) -> 1(1(0(2(5(x1))))) 5(0(4(x1))) -> 0(5(4(1(1(x1))))) 5(2(4(x1))) -> 5(2(1(1(3(4(x1)))))) 5(3(2(x1))) -> 1(1(3(5(1(2(x1)))))) 5(5(0(x1))) -> 5(1(1(5(0(x1))))) 0(0(2(4(x1)))) -> 0(4(0(2(1(1(x1)))))) 0(3(1(2(x1)))) -> 1(1(3(0(2(x1))))) 0(3(2(4(x1)))) -> 2(1(3(0(4(4(x1)))))) 0(4(3(2(x1)))) -> 2(3(4(0(1(x1))))) 3(0(2(4(x1)))) -> 3(0(4(2(1(1(x1)))))) 3(0(5(4(x1)))) -> 3(4(0(5(1(3(x1)))))) 3(1(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(1(3(0(1(x1)))))) 3(2(4(0(x1)))) -> 3(1(0(4(2(x1))))) 3(2(4(5(x1)))) -> 3(1(4(2(1(5(x1)))))) 3(2(5(4(x1)))) -> 3(4(3(5(2(x1))))) 3(5(3(2(x1)))) -> 3(3(0(2(5(x1))))) 4(0(4(2(x1)))) -> 4(4(2(1(3(0(x1)))))) 4(3(2(0(x1)))) -> 0(2(1(3(4(x1))))) 5(4(1(0(x1)))) -> 5(1(1(4(0(1(x1)))))) 5(5(0(0(x1)))) -> 1(1(0(5(5(0(x1)))))) 5(5(2(2(x1)))) -> 5(5(1(1(2(2(x1)))))) 0(0(1(2(4(x1))))) -> 0(0(2(1(1(4(x1)))))) 0(5(3(1(2(x1))))) -> 5(2(1(3(1(0(x1)))))) 0(5(5(1(0(x1))))) -> 5(0(0(5(1(1(x1)))))) 3(0(1(4(5(x1))))) -> 3(4(0(5(1(1(x1)))))) 3(0(3(1(2(x1))))) -> 0(2(1(1(3(3(x1)))))) 3(2(2(0(4(x1))))) -> 3(2(2(0(1(4(x1)))))) 3(5(1(4(0(x1))))) -> 1(3(3(4(5(0(x1)))))) 3(5(3(0(4(x1))))) -> 3(0(1(5(3(4(x1)))))) 5(1(0(2(4(x1))))) -> 2(1(5(4(0(3(x1)))))) 5(1(3(2(0(x1))))) -> 2(3(5(0(1(1(x1)))))) 5(4(2(0(2(x1))))) -> 5(0(4(2(1(2(x1)))))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(1(x_1)) -> 1(encArg(x_1)) encArg(2(x_1)) -> 2(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_0(x_1)) -> 0(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_3(x_1)) -> 3(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_5(x_1)) -> 5(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_4(x_1)) -> 4(encArg(x_1)) encode_0(x_1) -> 0(encArg(x_1)) encode_1(x_1) -> 1(encArg(x_1)) encode_2(x_1) -> 2(encArg(x_1)) encode_3(x_1) -> 3(encArg(x_1)) encode_4(x_1) -> 4(encArg(x_1)) encode_5(x_1) -> 5(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS