Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103160

details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	135652.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n141.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	ICFP_2010

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	295.996 seconds
cpu usage	833.223
user time	825.305
system time	7.91785
max virtual memory	1.874378E7
max residence set size	1.5015972E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	KILLED

output

KILLED
proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml
# AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty


The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).

(0) DCpxTrs
(1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(2) CpxRelTRS
(3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 42 ms]
(4) CpxRelTRS
(5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(6) TRS for Loop Detection
(7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
(8) CpxRelTRS
    (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (10) typed CpxTrs
    (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 6 ms]
    (12) typed CpxTrs
(13) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(14) CpxTRS
(15) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
(16) CpxRelTRS
    (17) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1095 ms]
    (18) CpxRelTRS
    (19) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
    (20) CpxWeightedTrs
        (21) CpxWeightedTrsRenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (22) CpxWeightedTrs
        (23) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (24) CpxTypedWeightedTrs
        (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
        (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
            (27) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1886 ms]
            (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
            (29) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 85 ms]
            (30) CpxRNTS
            (31) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 64 ms]
            (32) CpxRNTS
        (33) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
        (34) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs
            (35) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms]
            (36) CpxRNTS
    (37) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 822 ms]
    (38) CdtProblem
        (39) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 3 ms]
        (40) CdtProblem
        (41) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms]
        (42) CdtProblem
        (43) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms]
        (44) CdtProblem
        (45) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 6834 ms]
        (46) CdtProblem
        (47) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1946 ms]
        (48) CdtProblem
        (49) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1998 ms]
        (50) CdtProblem
        (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2012 ms]
        (52) CdtProblem
        (53) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2023 ms]
        (54) CdtProblem


----------------------------------------

(0)
Obligation:
The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF).


The TRS R consists of the following rules:

   0(0(0(0(0(0(3(5(3(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(4(4(1(4(4(0(1(1(3(3(1(4(4(1(1(0(x1)))))))))))))))))
   0(0(2(3(1(5(5(0(5(2(4(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(4(1(4(4(4(4(1(0(0(4(5(4(4(3(0(4(3(x1))))))))))))))))))
   0(0(3(0(5(5(0(0(3(3(0(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(1(0(5(4(2(3(3(5(4(5(4(4(0(x1))))))))))))))
   0(0(3(2(0(3(4(2(2(3(0(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(1(5(5(0(0(1(4(4(4(1(1(3(0(x1))))))))))))))
   0(0(3(4(2(3(0(0(5(5(2(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(4(2(4(0(1(1(0(4(0(2(0(5(5(4(x1)))))))))))))))
   0(1(5(3(0(5(3(2(5(5(1(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(4(0(1(4(4(4(2(4(1(4(2(3(0(1(5(1(x1)))))))))))))))))
   0(2(0(3(5(0(5(5(3(1(3(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(3(1(4(3(0(4(3(4(4(1(0(4(2(x1))))))))))))))
   0(2(1(0(0(1(3(2(0(2(1(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(2(4(3(3(4(5(4(4(0(0(1(4(4(x1))))))))))))))
   0(3(0(0(1(5(5(2(4(5(5(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(4(2(4(5(0(4(4(4(4(2(4(0(1(4(4(3(x1)))))))))))))))))
   0(3(2(0(3(2(0(3(5(2(4(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(3(4(1(1(3(3(4(4(4(4(0(1(1(1(3(4(4(x1))))))))))))))))))
   0(3(2(5(3(4(0(0(5(5(3(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(4(1(2(4(4(0(4(2(0(4(5(4(5(2(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))))
   0(5(0(1(2(5(1(1(2(1(4(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(4(4(1(3(0(4(3(3(1(0(1(3(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))
   0(5(1(0(5(0(5(3(4(0(5(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(1(2(2(4(5(1(3(4(1(0(4(4(2(0(x1)))))))))))))))
   0(5(2(1(2(5(0(5(5(3(2(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(1(4(5(4(2(3(4(0(2(1(4(4(0(x1))))))))))))))
   1(0(3(5(1(5(1(2(3(0(3(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(4(1(1(1(1(4(3(1(1(0(1(3(4(3(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))))
   1(0(5(1(1(5(3(5(2(3(5(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(0(4(5(1(2(4(2(4(5(1(4(1(1(x1))))))))))))))
   1(0(5(1(3(3(5(5(0(0(2(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(0(3(5(3(4(4(4(4(1(4(1(2(4(0(x1)))))))))))))))
   1(1(0(5(0(5(2(4(2(3(5(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(1(3(4(4(4(4(4(4(5(4(3(1(4(3(1(4(3(x1))))))))))))))))))
   1(1(2(1(3(0(3(2(5(3(3(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(3(5(3(4(4(5(1(4(4(4(1(3(4(4(1(4(3(x1))))))))))))))))))
   1(1(2(1(3(5(4(4(0(0(3(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(0(1(1(0(4(3(4(3(1(0(0(4(5(x1))))))))))))))
   1(1(2(3(3(4(0(5(0(0(0(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(2(4(4(5(2(1(1(3(4(3(4(4(1(3(x1)))))))))))))))
   1(2(0(0(5(5(0(5(0(0(0(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(2(3(0(4(4(4(0(1(3(3(5(3(3(3(1(4(x1)))))))))))))))))
   1(2(0(5(0(4(1(1(2(5(1(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(2(4(3(3(0(3(4(0(1(5(4(4(4(4(x1)))))))))))))))
   1(2(0(5(4(1(5(5(1(3(5(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(4(1(3(4(4(1(4(4(0(4(4(3(2(4(4(5(x1)))))))))))))))))
   1(2(0(5(5(5(5(3(2(3(2(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 5(1(5(5(0(4(0(0(4(1(4(4(4(1(1(3(3(3(x1))))))))))))))))))
   1(2(1(3(5(2(2(2(2(1(3(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(4(1(0(5(4(3(1(5(5(4(0(4(4(x1))))))))))))))
   1(2(3(2(0(5(5(2(0(0(1(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 5(1(4(1(4(2(2(2(1(4(0(4(4(5(x1))))))))))))))

popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS