details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	139310.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n151.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	ICFP_2010

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	292.907 seconds
cpu usage	961.175
user time	953.556
system time	7.61871
max virtual memory	1.8778516E7
max residence set size	1.4746472E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	KILLED

output

KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 63 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) typed CpxTrs (13) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (14) CpxTRS (15) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxRelTRS (17) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1353 ms] (18) CpxRelTRS (19) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) CpxWeightedTrs (21) CpxWeightedTrsRenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 27 ms] (22) CpxWeightedTrs (23) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (27) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1677 ms] (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (29) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 97 ms] (30) CpxRNTS (31) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 109 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 16 ms] (34) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (35) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 19 ms] (36) CpxRNTS (37) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 1099 ms] (38) CdtProblem (39) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 7 ms] (40) CdtProblem (41) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (42) CdtProblem (43) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (44) CdtProblem (45) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 7854 ms] (46) CdtProblem (47) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2381 ms] (48) CdtProblem (49) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2404 ms] (50) CdtProblem (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2379 ms] (52) CdtProblem (53) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2383 ms] (54) CdtProblem (55) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 6225 ms] (56) CdtProblem (57) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 6604 ms] (58) CdtProblem ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(0(0(1(2(0(0(3(3(1(2(2(1(1(2(2(3(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(3(0(1(2(3(2(2(0(0(1(2(2(3(1(1(0(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(0(0(3(3(1(3(0(2(3(1(1(2(2(2(0(2(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(0(0(0(1(2(3(2(1(3(3(2(0(2(3(2(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(0(1(0(1(3(2(3(3(2(1(0(1(0(2(2(1(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(3(1(1(3(2(2(3(2(0(0(0(0(1(1(2(1(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(1(0(1(0(2(2(0(0(1(3(1(2(3(0(2(2(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(0(1(1(2(3(1(2(0(0(2(2(3(0(2(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(1(0(1(3(1(3(0(1(2(3(0(0(3(1(3(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(1(3(2(3(0(3(1(1(0(0(3(1(0(3(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(1(0(2(0(0(0(3(3(0(1(1(2(2(0(0(0(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(0(1(3(3(0(2(0(2(0(0(1(0(2(0(0(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(1(3(2(2(1(3(1(0(3(1(2(0(0(0(1(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(3(0(2(0(3(0(1(2(2(1(1(1(3(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(1(3(3(0(3(0(2(3(2(2(1(1(2(1(2(2(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 1(2(3(1(1(0(2(3(0(2(1(2(3(0(2(2(3(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(2(1(2(2(0(0(3(3(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(1(0(1(2(0(1(3(0(0(1(2(1(3(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(2(2(1(3(2(0(1(3(3(3(1(3(0(0(3(2(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(3(3(2(3(0(1(1(2(3(1(3(0(3(0(2(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(2(2(3(0(2(1(0(1(3(0(1(2(0(0(3(0(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(3(2(3(1(3(2(0(0(0(0(2(0(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(2(2(3(3(1(1(3(1(3(3(1(3(2(1(1(0(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(3(3(2(3(2(3(1(3(1(1(0(1(1(3(2(1(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(0(0(0(0(1(3(1(2(3(3(2(1(2(1(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 3(1(0(3(3(2(3(2(1(1(0(1(0(0(2(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(1(1(3(1(3(1(2(0(0(0(0(0(3(3(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 3(3(0(0(1(1(3(3(2(0(0(1(3(1(0(0(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(1(3(2(1(1(0(1(3(1(3(1(1(2(2(3(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 3(1(0(3(2(3(2(3(1(1(1(1(3(2(0(1(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(3(0(3(0(1(2(1(0(3(0(0(2(1(3(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(0(1(0(0(2(3(3(3(2(3(0(0(1(1(3(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(3(3(1(0(1(0(3(2(2(1(0(3(3(0(3(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 3(0(1(3(3(1(3(2(0(0(1(0(3(2(0(3(3(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(3(3(1(0(2(1(0(3(3(0(3(1(2(2(3(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(0(0(1(2(3(3(3(2(3(3(0(3(1(1(3(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(3(3(3(3(0(3(2(1(3(0(0(1(3(0(2(2(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(3(3(3(1(1(0(0(0(3(2(3(0(2(3(2(3(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(0(0(1(1(1(0(2(3(0(3(2(2(2(3(3(3(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(3(2(3(2(3(3(2(0(0(1(1(2(1(1(3(0(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(0(0(2(0(1(0(3(2(2(2(0(1(3(0(3(2(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 3(1(2(0(1(1(0(0(2(3(2(0(0(0(2(3(2(3(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(0(2(0(0(2(2(1(0(3(1(1(3(3(0(1(1(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 0(2(3(0(2(0(0(1(1(1(1(2(1(1(3(3(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 1(0(2(0(1(0(0(3(3(2(1(2(1(2(1(2(0(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) -> 1(2(1(0(1(2(3(2(0(0(2(3(1(0(2(1(0(1(x1)))))))))))))))))) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS