Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103608
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
26923.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n140.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
ICFP_2010
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
297.241 seconds
cpu usage
824.74
user time
816.684
system time
8.0564
max virtual memory
1.8918664E7
max residence set size
1.49112E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
KILLED
output
KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 79 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) typed CpxTrs (13) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (14) CpxTRS (15) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxRelTRS (17) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1722 ms] (18) CpxRelTRS (19) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) CpxWeightedTrs (21) CpxWeightedTrsRenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 30 ms] (22) CpxWeightedTrs (23) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (27) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2104 ms] (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (29) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 155 ms] (30) CpxRNTS (31) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 189 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (34) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (35) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 33 ms] (36) CpxRNTS (37) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 880 ms] (38) CdtProblem (39) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (40) CdtProblem (41) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 19 ms] (42) CdtProblem (43) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (44) CdtProblem (45) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 6822 ms] (46) CdtProblem (47) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2007 ms] (48) CdtProblem (49) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1967 ms] (50) CdtProblem (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1958 ms] (52) CdtProblem (53) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1983 ms] (54) CdtProblem (55) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2000 ms] (56) CdtProblem ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(1(2(0(3(4(x1)))))) -> 0(1(0(2(3(4(x1)))))) 1(2(3(1(4(4(1(x1))))))) -> 1(2(1(3(4(4(1(x1))))))) 2(2(5(3(2(4(5(3(x1)))))))) -> 2(2(5(2(3(4(5(3(x1)))))))) 4(2(3(5(4(2(2(0(x1)))))))) -> 4(2(5(3(4(2(2(0(x1)))))))) 5(3(5(1(5(3(5(3(x1)))))))) -> 5(3(5(1(3(5(5(3(x1)))))))) 3(2(3(1(3(5(4(1(1(x1))))))))) -> 3(1(3(3(4(2(1(5(1(x1))))))))) 3(4(2(5(3(2(1(2(1(x1))))))))) -> 3(4(2(5(3(1(2(2(1(x1))))))))) 3(1(3(0(4(5(2(4(5(0(x1)))))))))) -> 3(1(3(4(0(5(2(4(5(0(x1)))))))))) 4(5(5(1(2(1(3(2(3(2(x1)))))))))) -> 5(5(0(0(5(0(3(3(2(1(x1)))))))))) 5(0(1(4(1(2(5(1(5(2(x1)))))))))) -> 4(5(5(0(2(0(5(4(5(4(x1)))))))))) 5(0(5(4(0(3(1(5(4(2(x1)))))))))) -> 5(0(5(4(0(1(3(5(4(2(x1)))))))))) 0(3(0(2(4(1(2(2(4(0(5(x1))))))))))) -> 2(4(4(3(0(2(5(1(4(4(x1)))))))))) 0(5(0(3(0(1(2(4(0(4(3(x1))))))))))) -> 5(0(4(5(1(0(1(4(2(3(x1)))))))))) 0(5(2(4(1(5(0(2(1(5(1(x1))))))))))) -> 5(0(1(1(1(4(2(0(3(0(x1)))))))))) 0(5(3(5(0(5(3(3(2(1(3(x1))))))))))) -> 0(3(4(0(5(1(4(4(5(2(x1)))))))))) 0(5(4(4(1(0(5(1(4(5(5(x1))))))))))) -> 0(1(3(4(4(1(4(3(5(0(x1)))))))))) 1(3(2(2(5(5(1(5(1(2(1(x1))))))))))) -> 4(4(0(0(1(2(4(1(5(4(x1)))))))))) 1(4(4(5(2(2(1(0(0(0(2(x1))))))))))) -> 3(5(1(1(4(2(4(0(2(0(x1)))))))))) 1(5(0(4(0(1(2(5(5(5(3(x1))))))))))) -> 4(3(2(3(2(4(1(0(3(3(x1)))))))))) 1(5(1(2(2(1(1(0(5(5(0(x1))))))))))) -> 0(3(0(1(1(2(2(0(1(4(x1)))))))))) 2(0(0(4(5(0(5(3(0(4(2(x1))))))))))) -> 2(0(0(4(5(5(0(3(4(0(2(x1))))))))))) 2(1(5(3(3(1(4(1(0(4(0(x1))))))))))) -> 4(4(3(5(0(0(5(3(2(4(x1)))))))))) 2(2(4(1(3(2(4(0(2(5(4(x1))))))))))) -> 0(4(2(3(1(2(3(0(1(4(x1)))))))))) 2(3(2(4(0(0(3(4(3(2(0(x1))))))))))) -> 5(2(1(5(0(5(1(1(5(3(x1)))))))))) 2(3(4(1(2(3(2(2(0(5(0(x1))))))))))) -> 2(2(3(0(5(1(4(1(1(2(x1))))))))))
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS