Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103700
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
138269.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n139.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
ICFP_2010
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
294.254 seconds
cpu usage
851.498
user time
843.704
system time
7.79403
max virtual memory
1.8752788E7
max residence set size
1.4902144E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
KILLED
output
KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 47 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) typed CpxTrs (13) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (14) CpxTRS (15) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxRelTRS (17) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1122 ms] (18) CpxRelTRS (19) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) CpxWeightedTrs (21) CpxWeightedTrsRenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 62 ms] (22) CpxWeightedTrs (23) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (25) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (26) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (27) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1981 ms] (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (29) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 136 ms] (30) CpxRNTS (31) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 42 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (34) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (35) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (36) CpxRNTS (37) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 925 ms] (38) CdtProblem (39) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 3 ms] (40) CdtProblem (41) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (42) CdtProblem (43) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 1 ms] (44) CdtProblem (45) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 7423 ms] (46) CdtProblem (47) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2231 ms] (48) CdtProblem (49) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2209 ms] (50) CdtProblem (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2222 ms] (52) CdtProblem (53) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 2249 ms] (54) CdtProblem ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(1(0(2(2(3(5(3(4(4(4(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(1(0(0(3(1(1(0(0(1(2(3(1(0(0(x1))))))))))))))) 0(1(3(1(5(1(1(5(2(4(1(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 5(3(2(3(0(0(5(2(0(3(3(2(3(3(1(x1))))))))))))))) 0(1(5(1(4(1(2(4(1(4(1(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(3(0(2(0(5(0(5(3(3(5(1(1(5(3(1(1(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(1(5(2(2(1(2(5(2(3(1(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(1(0(0(4(5(4(2(0(5(2(1(2(2(0(0(4(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(1(5(5(5(2(3(2(2(2(2(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(5(0(0(3(2(0(0(4(0(3(4(0(3(2(3(4(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(2(0(5(5(5(3(5(5(3(5(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(3(3(3(1(0(5(1(0(3(3(2(1(5(5(x1))))))))))))))) 0(2(4(3(2(5(5(5(2(5(0(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(1(1(3(4(0(3(5(2(2(2(3(0(5(1(0(x1)))))))))))))))) 0(2(4(3(5(1(5(4(1(4(1(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(1(0(0(3(1(0(0(1(5(0(4(3(5(5(0(0(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(4(1(2(5(2(1(1(2(2(5(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(0(0(1(1(0(1(4(5(4(3(1(0(1(4(5(4(x1))))))))))))))))) 0(4(1(5(2(5(3(3(3(5(2(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(0(3(2(0(0(5(1(0(0(4(2(1(0(3(0(2(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 0(5(2(5(0(3(0(1(2(5(5(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(3(1(3(3(1(1(0(2(4(4(0(0(5(4(4(4(x1))))))))))))))))) 1(0(2(4(1(5(5(4(1(2(1(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(5(1(0(1(3(1(0(0(5(0(0(4(2(2(4(2(x1))))))))))))))))) 1(0(4(1(4(3(2(5(5(3(2(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(0(0(3(2(4(3(2(1(3(2(0(0(4(4(0(0(x1))))))))))))))))) 1(1(2(5(4(1(2(3(5(1(3(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(3(1(1(1(0(5(3(0(5(0(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))) 1(2(1(4(3(5(2(2(1(5(5(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(3(5(3(5(5(0(0(5(0(0(2(0(1(1(x1))))))))))))))) 1(3(2(4(4(2(3(2(2(3(2(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(3(0(4(0(0(4(5(3(0(3(1(0(0(0(x1))))))))))))))) 1(4(0(4(1(1(1(4(1(2(4(1(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(1(3(0(0(2(1(2(3(3(5(1(3(2(x1)))))))))))))) 1(5(1(4(3(3(5(5(2(4(1(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 1(4(2(0(3(0(2(5(0(5(1(5(1(5(x1)))))))))))))) 2(0(0(5(5(2(0(1(4(4(5(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(0(3(1(3(0(2(3(4(2(5(1(0(1(x1)))))))))))))) 2(0(3(5(3(4(4(3(2(4(0(3(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(0(5(0(0(3(1(3(0(1(0(0(0(1(x1)))))))))))))) 2(0(5(2(2(5(1(4(1(1(1(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 4(0(0(0(0(3(1(0(0(2(1(0(2(4(4(3(0(x1))))))))))))))))) 2(1(2(5(2(4(2(5(2(2(4(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(1(2(0(4(5(0(0(2(5(3(0(2(1(5(1(x1)))))))))))))))) 2(1(4(1(5(5(1(0(2(4(2(5(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(3(0(2(3(1(0(5(0(3(5(4(0(1(x1)))))))))))))) 2(1(5(5(2(5(5(0(3(0(5(2(x1)))))))))))) -> 0(3(1(2(4(4(0(0(5(3(0(0(2(1(0(5(1(0(x1)))))))))))))))))) 2(2(2(4(1(2(2(4(2(2(4(0(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(5(0(5(0(4(0(3(0(4(2(0(5(1(3(0(0(2(x1)))))))))))))))))) 2(2(2(5(2(2(2(3(1(4(1(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 2(4(0(1(3(1(1(3(3(3(1(1(2(0(2(3(0(x1))))))))))))))))) 2(2(4(1(2(1(1(5(4(1(4(4(x1)))))))))))) -> 3(3(3(3(0(4(5(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(2(5(0(0(x1))))))))))))))))))
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS