Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103728
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
230819.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n143.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
ICFP_2010
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
296.378 seconds
cpu usage
901.04
user time
894.956
system time
6.08421
max virtual memory
1.896292E7
max residence set size
1.5143712E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
KILLED
output
KILLED proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 43 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (12) typed CpxTrs (13) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 519 ms] (14) BOUNDS(1, INF) (15) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxTRS (17) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (18) CpxRelTRS (19) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 836 ms] (20) CpxRelTRS (21) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (22) CpxWeightedTrs (23) CpxWeightedTrsRenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxWeightedTrs (25) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (26) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (27) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (28) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (29) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 9 ms] (30) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (31) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 15 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (34) CpxRNTS (35) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 3 ms] (36) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (37) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (38) CpxRNTS (39) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 219 ms] (40) CdtProblem (41) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (42) CdtProblem (43) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (44) CdtProblem (45) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (46) CdtProblem (47) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (48) CdtProblem (49) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 1003 ms] (50) CdtProblem (51) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 236 ms] (52) CdtProblem (53) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (54) CdtProblem (55) CdtNarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 253 ms] (56) CdtProblem (57) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (58) CdtProblem (59) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 7268 ms] (60) CdtProblem ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(x1) -> 1(x1) 0(0(x1)) -> 0(x1) 3(4(5(x1))) -> 4(3(5(x1))) 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) 0(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(0(0(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(1(0(0(1(1(0(1(0(1(0(1(1(1(0(0(0(1(0(1(0(0(1(0(1(0(1(0(0(0(0(0(0(1(1(0(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(0(1(1(1(1(0(1(1(1(1(1(0(1(0(1(1(0(1(1(0(1(0(0(1(1(x1)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) -> 2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(2(x1))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(1(x_1)) -> 1(encArg(x_1)) encArg(4(x_1)) -> 4(encArg(x_1)) encArg(5(x_1)) -> 5(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_0(x_1)) -> 0(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_3(x_1)) -> 3(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_2(x_1)) -> 2(encArg(x_1)) encode_0(x_1) -> 0(encArg(x_1)) encode_1(x_1) -> 1(encArg(x_1))
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS