details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	LengthOfFiniteLists_nosorts_noand_GM.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n138.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	9.75228 seconds
cpu usage	34.9419
user time	33.52
system time	1.42189
max virtual memory	5.5815072E7
max residence set size	4052364.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 347 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection (13) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 3926 ms] (14) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__zeros -> cons(0, zeros) a__U11(tt, L) -> a__U12(tt, L) a__U12(tt, L) -> s(a__length(mark(L))) a__length(nil) -> 0 a__length(cons(N, L)) -> a__U11(tt, L) mark(zeros) -> a__zeros mark(U11(X1, X2)) -> a__U11(mark(X1), X2) mark(U12(X1, X2)) -> a__U12(mark(X1), X2) mark(length(X)) -> a__length(mark(X)) mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) mark(0) -> 0 mark(tt) -> tt mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) mark(nil) -> nil a__zeros -> zeros a__U11(X1, X2) -> U11(X1, X2) a__U12(X1, X2) -> U12(X1, X2) a__length(X) -> length(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(zeros) -> zeros encArg(tt) -> tt encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(nil) -> nil encArg(U11(x_1, x_2)) -> U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(U12(x_1, x_2)) -> U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(length(x_1)) -> length(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a__zeros) -> a__zeros encArg(cons_a__U11(x_1, x_2)) -> a__U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_a__U12(x_1, x_2)) -> a__U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_a__length(x_1)) -> a__length(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_a__zeros -> a__zeros encode_cons(x_1, x_2) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_zeros -> zeros encode_a__U11(x_1, x_2) -> a__U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_tt -> tt encode_a__U12(x_1, x_2) -> a__U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_a__length(x_1) -> a__length(encArg(x_1)) encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_nil -> nil encode_U11(x_1, x_2) -> U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_U12(x_1, x_2) -> U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_length(x_1) -> length(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__zeros -> cons(0, zeros) a__U11(tt, L) -> a__U12(tt, L) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS