Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103918
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex23_Luc06_FR.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n139.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
291.518 seconds
cpu usage
336.497
user time
332.981
system time
3.51587
max virtual memory
1.8985136E7
max residence set size
6104984.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2))
output
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 51 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) NonCtorToCtorProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxRelTRS (7) RcToIrcProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxRelTRS (9) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) CdtProblem (11) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (12) CdtProblem (13) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (14) CdtProblem (15) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (16) CdtProblem (17) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (18) CdtProblem (19) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 112 ms] (20) CdtProblem (21) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 45 ms] (22) CdtProblem (23) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 145 ms] (24) CdtProblem (25) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 101 ms] (26) CdtProblem (27) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 85 ms] (28) CdtProblem (29) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 81 ms] (30) CdtProblem (31) SIsEmptyProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (32) BOUNDS(1, 1) (33) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (34) TRS for Loop Detection (35) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 8 ms] (36) BEST (37) proven lower bound (38) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (39) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (40) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a)) -> c(n__f(n__g(n__f(n__a)))) f(X) -> n__f(X) g(X) -> n__g(X) a -> n__a activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(activate(X)) activate(n__a) -> a activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__f(x_1)) -> n__f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__g(x_1)) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__a) -> n__a encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_g(x_1)) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a) -> a encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_a -> a encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__f(x_1) -> n__f(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__g(x_1) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__a -> n__a encode_g(x_1) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2).
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS