Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS pair #487103948
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
OvConsOS_nosorts_GM.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n148.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
2.61421 seconds
cpu usage
6.97436
user time
6.68677
system time
0.287589
max virtual memory
1.8411988E7
max residence set size
673224.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)
output
WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 334 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 7 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection (13) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 289 ms] (14) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (full) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__zeros -> cons(0, zeros) a__and(tt, X) -> mark(X) a__length(nil) -> 0 a__length(cons(N, L)) -> s(a__length(mark(L))) a__take(0, IL) -> nil a__take(s(M), cons(N, IL)) -> cons(mark(N), take(M, IL)) mark(zeros) -> a__zeros mark(and(X1, X2)) -> a__and(mark(X1), X2) mark(length(X)) -> a__length(mark(X)) mark(take(X1, X2)) -> a__take(mark(X1), mark(X2)) mark(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(mark(X1), X2) mark(0) -> 0 mark(tt) -> tt mark(nil) -> nil mark(s(X)) -> s(mark(X)) a__zeros -> zeros a__and(X1, X2) -> and(X1, X2) a__length(X) -> length(X) a__take(X1, X2) -> take(X1, X2) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(zeros) -> zeros encArg(tt) -> tt encArg(nil) -> nil encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(take(x_1, x_2)) -> take(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(and(x_1, x_2)) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(length(x_1)) -> length(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a__zeros) -> a__zeros encArg(cons_a__and(x_1, x_2)) -> a__and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_a__length(x_1)) -> a__length(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a__take(x_1, x_2)) -> a__take(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_a__zeros -> a__zeros encode_cons(x_1, x_2) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_zeros -> zeros encode_a__and(x_1, x_2) -> a__and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_tt -> tt encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_a__length(x_1) -> a__length(encArg(x_1)) encode_nil -> nil encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_a__take(x_1, x_2) -> a__take(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_take(x_1, x_2) -> take(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_and(x_1, x_2) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_length(x_1) -> length(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: a__zeros -> cons(0, zeros)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS