details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	thiemann34.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n140.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	AProVE_07

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.686 seconds
cpu usage	1143.69
user time	1132.45
system time	11.2328
max virtual memory	3.8283572E7
max residence set size	1.501974E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 369 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxRelTRS (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) typed CpxTrs (9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 268 ms] (12) BEST (13) proven lower bound (14) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (15) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (16) typed CpxTrs (17) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 138 ms] (18) typed CpxTrs (19) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 1264 ms] (20) BOUNDS(1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: gt(s(x), 0) -> true gt(0, y) -> false gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) divides(x, y) -> div(x, y, y) div(0, 0, z) -> true div(0, s(x), z) -> false div(s(x), 0, s(z)) -> div(s(x), s(z), s(z)) div(s(x), s(y), z) -> div(x, y, z) prime(x) -> test(x, s(s(0))) test(x, y) -> if1(gt(x, y), x, y) if1(true, x, y) -> if2(divides(x, y), x, y) if1(false, x, y) -> true if2(true, x, y) -> false if2(false, x, y) -> test(x, s(y)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(true) -> true encArg(false) -> false encArg(cons_gt(x_1, x_2)) -> gt(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_divides(x_1, x_2)) -> divides(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_div(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> div(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_prime(x_1)) -> prime(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_test(x_1, x_2)) -> test(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_if1(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> if1(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_if2(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> if2(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_gt(x_1, x_2) -> gt(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_true -> true encode_false -> false encode_divides(x_1, x_2) -> divides(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_div(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> div(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_prime(x_1) -> prime(encArg(x_1)) encode_test(x_1, x_2) -> test(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_if1(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> if1(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_if2(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> if2(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: gt(s(x), 0) -> true gt(0, y) -> false gt(s(x), s(y)) -> gt(x, y) divides(x, y) -> div(x, y, y) div(0, 0, z) -> true div(0, s(x), z) -> false popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost