details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	toyama.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n141.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Strategy_removed_mixed_05

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.668 seconds
cpu usage	311.544
user time	308.773
system time	2.77099
max virtual memory	1.8881672E7
max residence set size	5303340.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))

output

WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 171 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToWeightedTrsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxWeightedTrs (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CpxTypedWeightedTrs (9) CompletionProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (11) NarrowingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 80 ms] (12) CpxTypedWeightedCompleteTrs (13) CpxTypedWeightedTrsToRntsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (14) CpxRNTS (15) InliningProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (16) CpxRNTS (17) SimplificationProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (18) CpxRNTS (19) CpxRntsAnalysisOrderProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) CpxRNTS (21) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 1 ms] (22) CpxRNTS (23) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 64 ms] (24) CpxRNTS (25) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 65 ms] (26) CpxRNTS (27) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (28) CpxRNTS (29) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 54 ms] (30) CpxRNTS (31) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 21 ms] (32) CpxRNTS (33) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (34) CpxRNTS (35) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 97 ms] (36) CpxRNTS (37) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 1 ms] (38) CpxRNTS (39) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (40) CpxRNTS (41) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 188 ms] (42) CpxRNTS (43) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 73 ms] (44) CpxRNTS (45) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (46) CpxRNTS (47) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 253 ms] (48) CpxRNTS (49) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 115 ms] (50) CpxRNTS (51) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (52) CpxRNTS (53) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 168 ms] (54) CpxRNTS (55) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 73 ms] (56) CpxRNTS (57) ResultPropagationProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (58) CpxRNTS (59) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 179 ms] (60) CpxRNTS (61) IntTrsBoundProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 62 ms] (62) CpxRNTS (63) FinalProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (64) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(0, 1, X) -> f(X, X, X) g(X, Y) -> X g(X, Y) -> Y S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(1) -> 1 encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_g(x_1, x_2)) -> g(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_f(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_0 -> 0 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost