details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	2.03.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n147.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	SK90

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.614 seconds
cpu usage	358.104
user time	350.552
system time	7.55193
max virtual memory	3.7579096E7
max residence set size	1.0084924E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^3))

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^3)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^3). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 172 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CdtProblem (7) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (8) CdtProblem (9) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) CdtProblem (11) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (12) CdtProblem (13) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (14) CdtProblem (15) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 84 ms] (16) CdtProblem (17) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^3)), 40 ms] (18) CdtProblem (19) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 18 ms] (20) CdtProblem (21) SIsEmptyProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (22) BOUNDS(1, 1) (23) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (24) CpxRelTRS (25) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (26) typed CpxTrs (27) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (28) typed CpxTrs (29) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 424 ms] (30) BEST (31) proven lower bound (32) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (33) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (34) typed CpxTrs (35) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 128 ms] (36) BOUNDS(1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^3). The TRS R consists of the following rules: minus(minus(x)) -> x minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x)) minus(f(x, y)) -> f(minus(y), minus(x)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(h(x_1)) -> h(encArg(x_1)) encArg(f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_minus(x_1)) -> minus(encArg(x_1)) encode_minus(x_1) -> minus(encArg(x_1)) encode_h(x_1) -> h(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^3). The TRS R consists of the following rules: minus(minus(x)) -> x minus(h(x)) -> h(minus(x)) minus(f(x, y)) -> f(minus(y), minus(x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(h(x_1)) -> h(encArg(x_1)) encArg(f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_minus(x_1)) -> minus(encArg(x_1)) encode_minus(x_1) -> minus(encArg(x_1)) encode_h(x_1) -> h(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost