details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	4.21.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n145.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	SK90

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.514 seconds
cpu usage	392.346
user time	389.604
system time	2.74178
max virtual memory	1.8892296E7
max residence set size	5176644.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 179 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxRelTRS (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) typed CpxTrs (9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 253 ms] (12) proven lower bound (13) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (14) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: and(x, or(y, z)) -> or(and(x, y), and(x, z)) and(x, and(y, y)) -> and(x, y) or(or(x, y), and(y, z)) -> or(x, y) or(x, and(x, y)) -> x or(true, y) -> true or(x, false) -> x or(x, x) -> x or(x, or(y, y)) -> or(x, y) and(x, true) -> x and(false, y) -> false and(x, x) -> x S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(true) -> true encArg(false) -> false encArg(cons_and(x_1, x_2)) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_or(x_1, x_2)) -> or(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_and(x_1, x_2) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_or(x_1, x_2) -> or(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_true -> true encode_false -> false ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: and(x, or(y, z)) -> or(and(x, y), and(x, z)) and(x, and(y, y)) -> and(x, y) or(or(x, y), and(y, z)) -> or(x, y) or(x, and(x, y)) -> x or(true, y) -> true or(x, false) -> x or(x, x) -> x or(x, or(y, y)) -> or(x, y) and(x, true) -> x and(false, y) -> false and(x, x) -> x The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(true) -> true encArg(false) -> false encArg(cons_and(x_1, x_2)) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_or(x_1, x_2)) -> or(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_and(x_1, x_2) -> and(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_or(x_1, x_2) -> or(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_true -> true encode_false -> false Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost