details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	aprove3.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n143.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Secret_05_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	292.515 seconds
cpu usage	1099.54
user time	1089.33
system time	10.215
max virtual memory	3.8039412E7
max residence set size	1.4719572E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 206 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: function(iszero, 0, dummy, dummy2) -> true function(iszero, s(x), dummy, dummy2) -> false function(p, 0, dummy, dummy2) -> 0 function(p, s(0), dummy, dummy2) -> 0 function(p, s(s(x)), dummy, dummy2) -> s(function(p, s(x), x, x)) function(plus, dummy, x, y) -> function(if, function(iszero, x, x, x), x, y) function(if, true, x, y) -> y function(if, false, x, y) -> function(plus, function(third, x, y, y), function(p, x, x, y), s(y)) function(third, x, y, z) -> z S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(iszero) -> iszero encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(true) -> true encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(false) -> false encArg(p) -> p encArg(plus) -> plus encArg(if) -> if encArg(third) -> third encArg(cons_function(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)) -> function(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3), encArg(x_4)) encode_function(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) -> function(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3), encArg(x_4)) encode_iszero -> iszero encode_0 -> 0 encode_true -> true encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_false -> false encode_p -> p encode_plus -> plus encode_if -> if encode_third -> third ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: function(iszero, 0, dummy, dummy2) -> true function(iszero, s(x), dummy, dummy2) -> false function(p, 0, dummy, dummy2) -> 0 function(p, s(0), dummy, dummy2) -> 0 function(p, s(s(x)), dummy, dummy2) -> s(function(p, s(x), x, x)) function(plus, dummy, x, y) -> function(if, function(iszero, x, x, x), x, y) function(if, true, x, y) -> y function(if, false, x, y) -> function(plus, function(third, x, y, y), function(p, x, x, y), s(y)) function(third, x, y, z) -> z The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(iszero) -> iszero encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(true) -> true encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(false) -> false encArg(p) -> p encArg(plus) -> plus encArg(if) -> if encArg(third) -> third popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost