details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	gen-15.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n149.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Secret_06_TRS

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.487 seconds
cpu usage	331.549
user time	329.148
system time	2.40081
max virtual memory	1.900916E7
max residence set size	5600568.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2))

output

WORST_CASE(?, O(n^2)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 159 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CdtProblem (7) CdtLeafRemovalProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) CdtProblem (9) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) CdtProblem (11) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (12) CdtProblem (13) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (14) CdtProblem (15) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (16) CdtProblem (17) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 720 ms] (18) CdtProblem (19) SIsEmptyProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (20) BOUNDS(1, 1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(z, x, a) -> f(b(b(f(z), z), x)) b(y, b(z, a)) -> f(b(c(f(a), y, z), z)) f(c(c(z, a, a), x, a)) -> z S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_c(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> c(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_b(x_1, x_2)) -> b(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> c(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_a -> a encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1, x_2) -> b(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(z, x, a) -> f(b(b(f(z), z), x)) b(y, b(z, a)) -> f(b(c(f(a), y, z), z)) f(c(c(z, a, a), x, a)) -> z The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_c(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> c(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_b(x_1, x_2)) -> b(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_c(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> c(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_a -> a encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_b(x_1, x_2) -> b(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: c(z, x, a) -> f(b(b(f(z), z), x)) b(y, b(z, a)) -> f(b(c(f(a), y, z), z)) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost