details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	ExIntrod_GM04_FR.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n137.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	10.8758 seconds
cpu usage	39.4877
user time	37.7059
system time	1.78182
max virtual memory	3.8186144E7
max residence set size	4199784.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 377 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 3 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection (13) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 3907 ms] (14) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: nats -> adx(zeros) zeros -> cons(n__0, n__zeros) incr(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(n__s(activate(X)), n__incr(activate(Y))) adx(cons(X, Y)) -> incr(cons(activate(X), n__adx(activate(Y)))) hd(cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X) tl(cons(X, Y)) -> activate(Y) 0 -> n__0 zeros -> n__zeros s(X) -> n__s(X) incr(X) -> n__incr(X) adx(X) -> n__adx(X) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) activate(n__incr(X)) -> incr(activate(X)) activate(n__adx(X)) -> adx(activate(X)) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(n__0) -> n__0 encArg(n__zeros) -> n__zeros encArg(n__s(x_1)) -> n__s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__incr(x_1)) -> n__incr(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__adx(x_1)) -> n__adx(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_nats) -> nats encArg(cons_zeros) -> zeros encArg(cons_incr(x_1)) -> incr(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_adx(x_1)) -> adx(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_hd(x_1)) -> hd(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_tl(x_1)) -> tl(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_0) -> 0 encArg(cons_s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_nats -> nats encode_adx(x_1) -> adx(encArg(x_1)) encode_zeros -> zeros encode_cons(x_1, x_2) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_n__0 -> n__0 encode_n__zeros -> n__zeros encode_incr(x_1) -> incr(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__s(x_1) -> n__s(encArg(x_1)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__incr(x_1) -> n__incr(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__adx(x_1) -> n__adx(encArg(x_1)) encode_hd(x_1) -> hd(encArg(x_1)) encode_tl(x_1) -> tl(encArg(x_1)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: nats -> adx(zeros) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost