details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex23_Luc06_FR.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n146.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.533 seconds
cpu usage	363.057
user time	355.599
system time	7.45806
max virtual memory	1.9183796E7
max residence set size	1.0600868E7

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2))

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 53 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CdtProblem (7) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (8) CdtProblem (9) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) CdtProblem (11) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (12) CdtProblem (13) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (14) CdtProblem (15) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 116 ms] (16) CdtProblem (17) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 52 ms] (18) CdtProblem (19) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 127 ms] (20) CdtProblem (21) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 99 ms] (22) CdtProblem (23) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 162 ms] (24) CdtProblem (25) SIsEmptyProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (26) BOUNDS(1, 1) (27) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 8 ms] (28) TRS for Loop Detection (29) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (30) BEST (31) proven lower bound (32) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (33) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (34) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a)) -> c(n__f(n__g(n__f(n__a)))) f(X) -> n__f(X) g(X) -> n__g(X) a -> n__a activate(n__f(X)) -> f(activate(X)) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(activate(X)) activate(n__a) -> a activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(c(x_1)) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__f(x_1)) -> n__f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__g(x_1)) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(n__a) -> n__a encArg(cons_f(x_1)) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_g(x_1)) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_a) -> a encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1) -> f(encArg(x_1)) encode_a -> a encode_c(x_1) -> c(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__f(x_1) -> n__f(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__g(x_1) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__a -> n__a encode_g(x_1) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a)) -> c(n__f(n__g(n__f(n__a)))) f(X) -> n__f(X) g(X) -> n__g(X) a -> n__a popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost