details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	LengthOfFiniteLists_nosorts-noand_FR.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n148.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	2.12085 seconds
cpu usage	5.49013
user time	5.2426
system time	0.24753
max virtual memory	1.8477524E7
max residence set size	479452.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 336 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 98 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection (13) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 8 ms] (14) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, activate(L)) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, activate(L)) zeros -> n__zeros activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(n__zeros) -> n__zeros encArg(tt) -> tt encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(nil) -> nil encArg(cons_zeros) -> zeros encArg(cons_U11(x_1, x_2)) -> U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_U12(x_1, x_2)) -> U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_length(x_1)) -> length(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_zeros -> zeros encode_cons(x_1, x_2) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_n__zeros -> n__zeros encode_U11(x_1, x_2) -> U11(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_tt -> tt encode_U12(x_1, x_2) -> U12(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_length(x_1) -> length(encArg(x_1)) encode_nil -> nil ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: zeros -> cons(0, n__zeros) U11(tt, L) -> U12(tt, activate(L)) U12(tt, L) -> s(length(activate(L))) length(nil) -> 0 length(cons(N, L)) -> U11(tt, activate(L)) zeros -> n__zeros activate(n__zeros) -> zeros activate(X) -> X The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(n__zeros) -> n__zeros encArg(tt) -> tt encArg(s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(nil) -> nil encArg(cons_zeros) -> zeros popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost