Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost pair #487108682
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex4_7_77_Bor03_C.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n144.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)
293.476 seconds
cpu usage
1119.63
user time
1105.18
system time
14.4407
max virtual memory
3.751706E7
max residence set size
1.5063864E7
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 258 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (8) BEST (9) proven lower bound (10) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (11) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (12) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(zeros) -> mark(cons(0, zeros)) active(tail(cons(X, XS))) -> mark(XS) active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2) active(tail(X)) -> tail(active(X)) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2)) tail(mark(X)) -> mark(tail(X)) proper(zeros) -> ok(zeros) proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(tail(X)) -> tail(proper(X)) cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2)) tail(ok(X)) -> ok(tail(X)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(zeros) -> zeros encArg(mark(x_1)) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encArg(0) -> 0 encArg(ok(x_1)) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_active(x_1)) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_cons(x_1, x_2)) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_tail(x_1)) -> tail(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_proper(x_1)) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_top(x_1)) -> top(encArg(x_1)) encode_active(x_1) -> active(encArg(x_1)) encode_zeros -> zeros encode_mark(x_1) -> mark(encArg(x_1)) encode_cons(x_1, x_2) -> cons(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_tail(x_1) -> tail(encArg(x_1)) encode_proper(x_1) -> proper(encArg(x_1)) encode_ok(x_1) -> ok(encArg(x_1)) encode_top(x_1) -> top(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: active(zeros) -> mark(cons(0, zeros)) active(tail(cons(X, XS))) -> mark(XS) active(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(active(X1), X2) active(tail(X)) -> tail(active(X)) cons(mark(X1), X2) -> mark(cons(X1, X2)) tail(mark(X)) -> mark(tail(X)) proper(zeros) -> ok(zeros) proper(cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(proper(X1), proper(X2)) proper(0) -> ok(0) proper(tail(X)) -> tail(proper(X)) cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) -> ok(cons(X1, X2)) tail(ok(X)) -> ok(tail(X)) top(mark(X)) -> top(proper(X)) top(ok(X)) -> top(active(X)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(zeros) -> zeros
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost