details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex4_4_Luc96b_FR.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n140.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.511 seconds
cpu usage	334.784
user time	328.97
system time	5.8137
max virtual memory	1.9112076E7
max residence set size	9362736.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2))

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^2)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 180 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) CpxTrsToCdtProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 10 ms] (6) CdtProblem (7) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (8) CdtProblem (9) CdtGraphSplitRhsProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (10) CdtProblem (11) CdtLeafRemovalProof [ComplexityIfPolyImplication, 0 ms] (12) CdtProblem (13) CdtUsableRulesProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (14) CdtProblem (15) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^1)), 87 ms] (16) CdtProblem (17) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 127 ms] (18) CdtProblem (19) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 129 ms] (20) CdtProblem (21) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 112 ms] (22) CdtProblem (23) CdtRuleRemovalProof [UPPER BOUND(ADD(n^2)), 110 ms] (24) CdtProblem (25) SIsEmptyProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (26) BOUNDS(1, 1) (27) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (28) CpxRelTRS (29) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (30) typed CpxTrs (31) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (32) typed CpxTrs (33) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 451 ms] (34) BEST (35) proven lower bound (36) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (37) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (38) typed CpxTrs (39) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 147 ms] (40) BOUNDS(1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, n__f(n__g(X), activate(Y))) f(X1, X2) -> n__f(X1, X2) g(X) -> n__g(X) activate(n__f(X1, X2)) -> f(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(activate(X)) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(n__f(x_1, x_2)) -> n__f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(n__g(x_1)) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_g(x_1)) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_g(x_1) -> g(encArg(x_1)) encode_n__f(x_1, x_2) -> n__f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_n__g(x_1) -> n__g(encArg(x_1)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^2). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(g(X), Y) -> f(X, n__f(n__g(X), activate(Y))) f(X1, X2) -> n__f(X1, X2) g(X) -> n__g(X) activate(n__f(X1, X2)) -> f(activate(X1), X2) activate(n__g(X)) -> g(activate(X)) activate(X) -> X popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost