details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex1_GM03_Z.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n139.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	1.81604 seconds
cpu usage	4.4121
user time	4.21914
system time	0.192963
max virtual memory	1.8476504E7
max residence set size	271948.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?)

output

WORST_CASE(NON_POLY, ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 341 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) TRS for Loop Detection (7) InfiniteLowerBoundProof [FINISHED, 5 ms] (8) BOUNDS(INF, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: p(0) -> 0 p(s(X)) -> X leq(0, Y) -> true leq(s(X), 0) -> false leq(s(X), s(Y)) -> leq(X, Y) if(true, X, Y) -> activate(X) if(false, X, Y) -> activate(Y) diff(X, Y) -> if(leq(X, Y), n__0, n__s(diff(p(X), Y))) 0 -> n__0 s(X) -> n__s(X) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) activate(X) -> X S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(true) -> true encArg(false) -> false encArg(n__0) -> n__0 encArg(n__s(x_1)) -> n__s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_p(x_1)) -> p(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_leq(x_1, x_2)) -> leq(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_if(x_1, x_2, x_3)) -> if(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encArg(cons_diff(x_1, x_2)) -> diff(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encArg(cons_0) -> 0 encArg(cons_s(x_1)) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encArg(cons_activate(x_1)) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_p(x_1) -> p(encArg(x_1)) encode_0 -> 0 encode_s(x_1) -> s(encArg(x_1)) encode_leq(x_1, x_2) -> leq(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_true -> true encode_false -> false encode_if(x_1, x_2, x_3) -> if(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2), encArg(x_3)) encode_activate(x_1) -> activate(encArg(x_1)) encode_diff(x_1, x_2) -> diff(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_n__0 -> n__0 encode_n__s(x_1) -> n__s(encArg(x_1)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(INF, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: p(0) -> 0 p(s(X)) -> X leq(0, Y) -> true leq(s(X), 0) -> false leq(s(X), s(Y)) -> leq(X, Y) if(true, X, Y) -> activate(X) if(false, X, Y) -> activate(Y) diff(X, Y) -> if(leq(X, Y), n__0, n__s(diff(p(X), Y))) 0 -> n__0 s(X) -> n__s(X) activate(n__0) -> 0 activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) activate(X) -> X The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(true) -> true encArg(false) -> false encArg(n__0) -> n__0 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost