details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	jw19.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n146.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Zantema_05

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	rcdcRelativeAlsoLower
runtime (wallclock)	291.464 seconds
cpu usage	471.393
user time	466.833
system time	4.5603
max virtual memory	5.6012284E7
max residence set size	6527332.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1))

output

WORST_CASE(?, O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). (0) DCpxTrs (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxRelTRS (3) SInnermostTerminationProof [BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID), 165 ms] (4) CpxRelTRS (5) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxTRS (7) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof [FINISHED, 110 ms] (8) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Derivational Complexity (innermost) of the given DCpxTrs could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(a, a)) -> f(f(f(a, a), a), f(a, x)) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (1) DerivationalComplexityToRuntimeComplexityProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) The following rules have been added to S to convert the given derivational complexity problem to a runtime complexity problem: encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_a -> a ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(a, a)) -> f(f(f(a, a), a), f(a, x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_a -> a Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (3) SInnermostTerminationProof (BOTH CONCRETE BOUNDS(ID, ID)) proved innermost termination of relative rules ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxRelTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(a, a)) -> f(f(f(a, a), a), f(a, x)) The (relative) TRS S consists of the following rules: encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_f(x_1, x_2) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) encode_a -> a Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST ---------------------------------------- (5) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(x, f(a, a)) -> f(f(f(a, a), a), f(a, x)) encArg(a) -> a encArg(cons_f(x_1, x_2)) -> f(encArg(x_1), encArg(x_2)) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Derivational Complexity: TRS Innermost