Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
Runtime Complexity: TRS pair #487110740
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
maude2.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n144.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
CiME_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE
configuration
complexity
runtime (wallclock)
291.61 seconds
cpu usage
316.347
user time
314.597
system time
1.75068
max virtual memory
1.8281608E7
max residence set size
5173668.0
stage attributes
key
value
starexec-result
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?)
output
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), ?) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) TRS for Loop Detection (3) DecreasingLoopProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (4) BEST (5) proven lower bound (6) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (7) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) (8) TRS for Loop Detection ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: p(s(N)) -> N +(N, 0) -> N +(s(N), s(M)) -> s(s(+(N, M))) *(N, 0) -> 0 *(s(N), s(M)) -> s(+(N, +(M, *(N, M)))) gt(0, M) -> False gt(NzN, 0) -> u_4(is_NzNat(NzN)) u_4(True) -> True is_NzNat(0) -> False is_NzNat(s(N)) -> True gt(s(N), s(M)) -> gt(N, M) lt(N, M) -> gt(M, N) d(0, N) -> N d(s(N), s(M)) -> d(N, M) quot(N, NzM) -> u_11(is_NzNat(NzM), N, NzM) u_11(True, N, NzM) -> u_1(gt(N, NzM), N, NzM) u_1(True, N, NzM) -> s(quot(d(N, NzM), NzM)) quot(NzM, NzM) -> u_01(is_NzNat(NzM)) u_01(True) -> s(0) quot(N, NzM) -> u_21(is_NzNat(NzM), NzM, N) u_21(True, NzM, N) -> u_2(gt(NzM, N)) u_2(True) -> 0 gcd(0, N) -> 0 gcd(NzM, NzM) -> u_02(is_NzNat(NzM), NzM) u_02(True, NzM) -> NzM gcd(NzN, NzM) -> u_31(is_NzNat(NzN), is_NzNat(NzM), NzN, NzM) u_31(True, True, NzN, NzM) -> u_3(gt(NzN, NzM), NzN, NzM) u_3(True, NzN, NzM) -> gcd(d(NzN, NzM), NzM) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToDecreasingLoopProblemProof (LOWER BOUND(ID)) Transformed a relative TRS into a decreasing-loop problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Analyzing the following TRS for decreasing loops: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: p(s(N)) -> N +(N, 0) -> N +(s(N), s(M)) -> s(s(+(N, M))) *(N, 0) -> 0 *(s(N), s(M)) -> s(+(N, +(M, *(N, M)))) gt(0, M) -> False gt(NzN, 0) -> u_4(is_NzNat(NzN)) u_4(True) -> True is_NzNat(0) -> False is_NzNat(s(N)) -> True gt(s(N), s(M)) -> gt(N, M) lt(N, M) -> gt(M, N) d(0, N) -> N d(s(N), s(M)) -> d(N, M) quot(N, NzM) -> u_11(is_NzNat(NzM), N, NzM) u_11(True, N, NzM) -> u_1(gt(N, NzM), N, NzM) u_1(True, N, NzM) -> s(quot(d(N, NzM), NzM)) quot(NzM, NzM) -> u_01(is_NzNat(NzM)) u_01(True) -> s(0) quot(N, NzM) -> u_21(is_NzNat(NzM), NzM, N) u_21(True, NzM, N) -> u_2(gt(NzM, N)) u_2(True) -> 0 gcd(0, N) -> 0 gcd(NzM, NzM) -> u_02(is_NzNat(NzM), NzM) u_02(True, NzM) -> NzM gcd(NzN, NzM) -> u_31(is_NzNat(NzN), is_NzNat(NzM), NzN, NzM) u_31(True, True, NzN, NzM) -> u_3(gt(NzN, NzM), NzN, NzM)
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to Runtime Complexity: TRS