details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	gmnp.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n138.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Rubio_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	complexity
runtime (wallclock)	3.82012 seconds
cpu usage	8.61844
user time	8.05993
system time	0.558507
max virtual memory	1.8347E7
max residence set size	1489860.0

stage attributes

key	value
starexec-result	WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1))

output

WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1), O(n^1)) proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). (0) CpxTRS (1) RelTrsToTrsProof [UPPER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (2) CpxTRS (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) (5) RenamingProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (6) CpxTRS (7) TypeInferenceProof [BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID), 0 ms] (8) typed CpxTrs (9) OrderProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 0 ms] (10) typed CpxTrs (11) RewriteLemmaProof [LOWER BOUND(ID), 412 ms] (12) proven lower bound (13) LowerBoundPropagationProof [FINISHED, 0 ms] (14) BOUNDS(n^1, INF) ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(a) -> f(c(a)) f(c(X)) -> X f(c(a)) -> f(d(b)) f(a) -> f(d(a)) f(d(X)) -> X f(c(b)) -> f(d(a)) e(g(X)) -> e(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (1) RelTrsToTrsProof (UPPER BOUND(ID)) transformed relative TRS to TRS ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(1, n^1). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(a) -> f(c(a)) f(c(X)) -> X f(c(a)) -> f(d(b)) f(a) -> f(d(a)) f(d(X)) -> X f(c(b)) -> f(d(a)) e(g(X)) -> e(X) S is empty. Rewrite Strategy: FULL ---------------------------------------- (3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (FINISHED) A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 3. The certificate found is represented by the following graph. "[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] {(1,2,[f_1|0, e_1|0, a|1, c_1|1, d_1|1, b|1, g_1|1, e_1|1, a|2, b|2, b|3]), (1,3,[f_1|1]), (1,5,[f_1|1]), (1,7,[f_1|1]), (1,9,[f_1|2]), (2,2,[a|0, c_1|0, d_1|0, b|0, g_1|0]), (3,4,[c_1|1]), (4,2,[a|1]), (5,6,[d_1|1]), (6,2,[a|1]), (7,8,[d_1|1]), (8,2,[b|1]), (9,10,[d_1|2]), (10,2,[b|2])}" ---------------------------------------- (4) BOUNDS(1, n^1) ---------------------------------------- (5) RenamingProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID)) Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF). The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(a) -> f(c(a)) f(c(X)) -> X f(c(a)) -> f(d(b)) f(a) -> f(d(a)) f(d(X)) -> X f(c(b)) -> f(d(a)) e(g(X)) -> e(X) popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to Runtime Complexity: TRS