Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
SRS Standard pair #487515942
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
88143.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n128.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
ICFP_2010
run statistics
property
value
solver
MultumNonMulta 3.16 29 June 2020 60G
configuration
default
runtime (wallclock)
2.02882504463 seconds
cpu usage
6.725662533
max memory
1.445728256E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
120185
starexec-result
YES
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES After renaming modulo { 0->0, 1->1, 2->2, 3->3 }, it remains to prove termination of the 28-rule system { 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 3 3 2 -> 0 2 2 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 3 2 2 3 1 2 2 , 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 2 -> 3 0 2 1 0 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 , 0 0 2 0 3 1 3 2 1 0 0 2 3 -> 0 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 0 3 1 3 2 1 2 , 0 1 0 0 3 3 2 1 2 0 1 2 3 -> 3 2 2 1 2 2 0 3 0 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 , 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 0 2 -> 2 0 3 3 2 2 1 0 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 , 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 -> 2 3 2 0 1 2 3 0 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 , 0 2 2 0 0 3 1 0 3 2 1 3 0 -> 3 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 , 0 2 3 3 1 0 3 3 0 2 3 1 1 -> 2 1 3 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 0 3 , 0 3 0 3 0 2 3 0 0 3 1 2 1 -> 3 1 1 2 2 3 0 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 0 , 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 1 3 -> 2 3 2 2 3 0 3 0 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 0 3 , 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 0 1 -> 1 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 1 0 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 , 1 0 2 3 0 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 -> 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 , 1 3 1 0 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 -> 1 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 2 2 , 2 0 0 1 3 0 3 1 3 0 1 2 1 -> 2 2 3 3 0 1 0 0 3 3 3 1 0 2 2 1 2 , 2 0 0 2 3 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 3 -> 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 3 1 3 1 , 2 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 3 2 0 3 3 -> 2 0 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 , 2 1 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 2 1 1 -> 2 2 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 2 3 2 3 0 2 2 , 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 0 2 3 0 1 -> 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 0 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 , 2 1 1 3 3 0 3 2 3 2 1 1 3 -> 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 3 3 0 1 3 , 2 1 1 3 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 -> 2 0 2 2 0 2 1 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 , 2 2 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 3 0 1 0 -> 2 2 2 1 0 2 0 1 3 1 3 0 3 3 3 3 2 , 2 2 0 0 3 0 2 2 3 0 1 3 3 -> 2 2 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 , 2 2 0 3 0 1 0 2 3 2 3 1 2 -> 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 2 , 2 2 1 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 0 -> 2 2 0 2 0 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 , 2 3 1 1 0 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 1 -> 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 1 3 3 , 2 3 2 0 3 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 2 -> 2 1 2 2 3 0 0 1 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 , 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 1 -> 2 2 2 0 3 2 2 0 2 3 2 3 0 2 2 0 2 , 3 0 2 3 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 -> 3 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 0 1 2 0 3 3 2 } The system was reversed. After renaming modulo { 2->0, 3->1, 1->2, 0->3 }, it remains to prove termination of the 28-rule system { 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 2 2 3 3 3 -> 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 3 1 0 2 3 2 0 0 3 , 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 -> 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 3 2 0 3 1 , 1 0 3 3 2 0 1 2 1 3 0 3 3 -> 0 2 0 1 2 1 3 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 3 , 1 0 2 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 2 3 -> 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 , 0 3 0 2 0 0 3 2 2 3 0 2 3 -> 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 2 0 0 1 1 3 0 , 3 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 3 -> 1 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 3 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 , 3 1 2 0 1 3 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 -> 3 2 2 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 , 2 2 1 0 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 0 3 -> 1 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 , 2 0 2 1 3 3 1 0 3 1 3 1 3 -> 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 , 1 2 1 3 0 0 2 3 2 1 3 1 3 -> 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 , 2 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 2 -> 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 2 , 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 3 2 -> 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 , 2 0 2 2 0 0 1 2 2 3 2 1 2 -> 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 2 , 2 0 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 3 0 -> 0 2 0 0 3 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 1 1 0 0 , 1 2 0 3 3 2 1 3 1 0 3 3 0 -> 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 , 1 1 3 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 3 2 0 -> 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 , 2 2 0 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 0 -> 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 2 3 0 0 , 2 3 1 0 3 1 2 2 3 0 2 2 0 -> 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 , 1 2 2 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 2 2 0 -> 1 2 3 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 , 0 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 0 -> 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 3 0 0 3 0 , 3 2 3 1 3 1 0 3 2 3 3 0 0 -> 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 3 0 3 2 0 0 0 , 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 3 1 3 3 0 0 -> 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 , 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 2 3 1 3 0 0 -> 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 , 3 0 2 3 2 2 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 -> 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 0 , 2 2 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 2 1 0 -> 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 , 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 3 0 1 0 -> 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 3 1 0 0 2 0 , 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 0 1 0 -> 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 , 3 2 3 3 1 1 3 2 3 1 0 3 1 -> 0 1 1 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 3 3 1 } Applying sparse tiling TRFC(2) [Geser/Hofbauer/Waldmann, FSCD 2019]. After renaming modulo { (0,0)->0, (0,1)->1, (1,1)->2, (1,2)->3, (2,1)->4, (1,0)->5, (0,2)->6, (2,2)->7, (2,3)->8, (3,3)->9, (3,0)->10, (1,3)->11, (3,1)->12, (3,2)->13, (2,0)->14, (0,3)->15, (3,5)->16, (4,0)->17, (1,5)->18, (4,1)->19, (4,2)->20, (0,5)->21, (4,3)->22, (2,5)->23 }, it remains to prove termination of the 700-rule system { 0 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 -> 0 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 10 , 0 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 12 -> 0 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 12 , 0 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 13 -> 0 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 13 , 0 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 9 -> 0 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 9 , 0 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 16 -> 0 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 16 , 5 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 -> 5 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 10 , 5 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 12 -> 5 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 12 , 5 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 13 -> 5 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 13 , 5 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 9 -> 5 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 9 , 5 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 16 -> 5 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 16 , 14 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 -> 14 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 10 , 14 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 12 -> 14 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 12 , 14 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 13 -> 14 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 13 , 14 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 9 -> 14 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 9 , 14 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 16 -> 14 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 16 , 10 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 -> 10 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 10 , 10 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 12 -> 10 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 12 , 10 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 13 -> 10 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 13 , 10 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 9 -> 10 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 9 , 10 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 16 -> 10 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 16 , 17 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 -> 17 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 10 , 17 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 7 8 9 9 12 -> 17 0 6 4 5 0 1 11 9 12 5 6 8 13 14 0 15 12 ,
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to SRS Standard