details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	09.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n134.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Gebhardt_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	58.2135770321 seconds
cpu usage	229.035867572
max memory	6.443819008E9

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	4800
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 794c25de1cacf0d048858bcd21c9a779e1221865 marcel 20200619 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 25 ms] (2) QDP (3) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 41 ms] (4) QDP (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 533 ms] (8) QDP (9) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(1(1(x1)))) 1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0(0(0(0(x1)))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0^1(1(1(1(x1)))) 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(1(1(x1))) 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(1(x1)) 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(x1) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(0(0(x1))) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(0(x1)) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(x1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: 0(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(1(1(x1)))) 1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0(0(0(0(x1)))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT) We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04,JAR06]. The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted. 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(1(1(x1))) 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(1(x1)) 0^1(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 1^1(x1) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(0(0(x1))) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(0(x1)) 1^1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0^1(x1) The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly. Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(0(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(0^1(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(1(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(1^1(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 The following usable rules [FROCOS05] with respect to the argument filtering of the ordering [JAR06] were oriented: 1(0(0(1(x1)))) -> 0(0(0(0(x1)))) 0(0(0(0(x1)))) -> 0(1(1(1(x1)))) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to SRS Standard