Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
TRS Standard pair #516961277
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
Ex1_GL02a_Z.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Transformed_CSR_04
run statistics
property
value
solver
NTI_22
configuration
default
runtime (wallclock)
8.34979820251 seconds
cpu usage
31.988606392
max memory
4.876935168E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
13134
starexec-result
NO
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO ** BEGIN proof argument ** The following rule was generated while unfolding the analyzed TRS: [iteration = 12] eq(n__s(n__length(cons(_0,n__inf(_1)))),n__s(n__length(cons(_2,n__inf(_3))))) -> eq(n__s(n__length(cons(_1,n__inf(n__s(_1))))),n__s(n__length(cons(_3,n__inf(s(_3)))))) Let l be the left-hand side and r be the right-hand side of this rule. Let p = epsilon, theta1 = {_4->_1} and theta2 = {_3->s(_3), _2->_3, _0->_4, _4->n__s(_4)}. We have r|p = eq(n__s(n__length(cons(_1,n__inf(n__s(_1))))),n__s(n__length(cons(_3,n__inf(s(_3)))))) and theta2(theta1(l)) = theta1(r|p). Hence, the term theta1(l) = eq(n__s(n__length(cons(_0,n__inf(_1)))),n__s(n__length(cons(_2,n__inf(_3))))) loops w.r.t. the analyzed TRS. ** END proof argument ** ** BEGIN proof description ** ## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule (a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable that does not occur in the left-hand side)... No generalized rewrite rule found! ## Applying the DP framework... ## 2 initial DP problems to solve. ## First, we try to decompose these problems into smaller problems. ## Round 1 [2 DP problems]: ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [eq^#(n__s(_0),n__s(_1)) -> eq^#(activate(_0),activate(_1))] TRS = {eq(n__0,n__0) -> true, eq(n__s(_0),n__s(_1)) -> eq(activate(_0),activate(_1)), eq(_0,_1) -> false, inf(_0) -> cons(_0,n__inf(s(_0))), take(0,_0) -> nil, take(s(_0),cons(_1,_2)) -> cons(activate(_1),n__take(activate(_0),activate(_2))), length(nil) -> 0, length(cons(_0,_1)) -> s(n__length(activate(_1))), 0 -> n__0, s(_0) -> n__s(_0), inf(_0) -> n__inf(_0), take(_0,_1) -> n__take(_0,_1), length(_0) -> n__length(_0), activate(n__0) -> 0, activate(n__s(_0)) -> s(_0), activate(n__inf(_0)) -> inf(_0), activate(n__take(_0,_1)) -> take(_0,_1), activate(n__length(_0)) -> length(_0), activate(_0) -> _0} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed! ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... This DP problem is too complex! Aborting! ## Trying with lexicographic path orders... Failed! ## Trying with Knuth-Bendix orders... This DP problem is too complex! Aborting! Don't know whether this DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [activate^#(n__take(_0,_1)) -> take^#(_0,_1), length^#(cons(_0,_1)) -> activate^#(_1), activate^#(n__length(_0)) -> length^#(_0), take^#(s(_0),cons(_1,_2)) -> activate^#(_2), take^#(s(_0),cons(_1,_2)) -> activate^#(_0), take^#(s(_0),cons(_1,_2)) -> activate^#(_1)] TRS = {eq(n__0,n__0) -> true, eq(n__s(_0),n__s(_1)) -> eq(activate(_0),activate(_1)), eq(_0,_1) -> false, inf(_0) -> cons(_0,n__inf(s(_0))), take(0,_0) -> nil, take(s(_0),cons(_1,_2)) -> cons(activate(_1),n__take(activate(_0),activate(_2))), length(nil) -> 0, length(cons(_0,_1)) -> s(n__length(activate(_1))), 0 -> n__0, s(_0) -> n__s(_0), inf(_0) -> n__inf(_0), take(_0,_1) -> n__take(_0,_1), length(_0) -> n__length(_0), activate(n__0) -> 0, activate(n__s(_0)) -> s(_0), activate(n__inf(_0)) -> inf(_0), activate(n__take(_0,_1)) -> take(_0,_1), activate(n__length(_0)) -> length(_0), activate(_0) -> _0} ## Trying with homeomorphic embeddings... Failed! ## Trying with polynomial interpretations... This DP problem is too complex! Aborting! ## Trying with lexicographic path orders... Failed! ## Trying with Knuth-Bendix orders... This DP problem is too complex! Aborting! Don't know whether this DP problem is finite. ## Some DP problems could not be proved finite. ## Now, we try to prove that one of these problems is infinite. ## Trying to find a loop (forward=true, backward=false, max=-1) # max_depth=3, unfold_variables=false: # Iteration 0: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 1: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 2: no loop found, 6 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 3: no loop found, 25 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 4: no loop found, 18 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 5: no loop found, 3 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 6: no loop found, 0 unfolded rule generated. No loop found at all! # max_depth=3, unfold_variables=true: # Iteration 0: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 1: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 2: no loop found, 6 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 3: no loop found, 25 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 4: no loop found, 18 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 5: no loop found, 3 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 6: no loop found, 0 unfolded rule generated. No loop found at all! # max_depth=4, unfold_variables=false: # Iteration 0: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 1: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 2: no loop found, 6 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 3: no loop found, 26 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 4: no loop found, 25 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 5: no loop found, 22 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 6: no loop found, 52 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 7: no loop found, 21 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 8: no loop found, 15 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 9: no loop found, 21 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 10: no loop found, 0 unfolded rule generated. No loop found at all! # max_depth=4, unfold_variables=true: # Iteration 0: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 1: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 2: no loop found, 6 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 3: no loop found, 26 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 4: no loop found, 25 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 5: no loop found, 22 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 6: no loop found, 52 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 7: no loop found, 21 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 8: no loop found, 15 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 9: no loop found, 21 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 10: no loop found, 0 unfolded rule generated. No loop found at all! # max_depth=5, unfold_variables=false: # Iteration 0: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 1: no loop found, 1 unfolded rule generated. # Iteration 2: no loop found, 6 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 3: no loop found, 26 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 4: no loop found, 29 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 5: no loop found, 52 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 6: no loop found, 196 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 7: no loop found, 108 unfolded rules generated. # Iteration 8: no loop found, 136 unfolded rules generated.
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to TRS Standard