details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	jwtpa1.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n136.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Waldmann_06

run statistics

property	value
solver	AProVE21
configuration	standard
runtime (wallclock)	5.65240693092 seconds
cpu usage	16.520697088
max memory	8.58210304E8

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	14480
starexec-result	YES

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) Overlay + Local Confluence [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QDP (9) SemLabProof [SOUND, 214 ms] (10) QDP (11) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (12) QDP (13) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 8 ms] (14) QDP (15) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 7 ms] (16) QDP (17) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (18) QDP (19) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (20) QDP (21) UsableRulesReductionPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (22) QDP (23) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 2 ms] (24) QDP (25) PisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (26) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a, x), y) -> f(y, f(x, f(a, f(h(a), a)))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) Overlay + Local Confluence (EQUIVALENT) The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [NOC] we can switch to innermost. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a, x), y) -> f(y, f(x, f(a, f(h(a), a)))) The set Q consists of the following terms: f(f(a, x0), x1) ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: F(f(a, x), y) -> F(y, f(x, f(a, f(h(a), a)))) F(f(a, x), y) -> F(x, f(a, f(h(a), a))) F(f(a, x), y) -> F(a, f(h(a), a)) F(f(a, x), y) -> F(h(a), a) The TRS R consists of the following rules: f(f(a, x), y) -> f(y, f(x, f(a, f(h(a), a)))) The set Q consists of the following terms: f(f(a, x0), x1) We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes. popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard