Spaces
Explore
Communities
Statistics
Reports
Cluster
Status
Help
SRS Standard pair #516975778
details
property
value
status
complete
benchmark
13.xml
ran by
Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout
1200 seconds
wallclock timeout
300 seconds
memory limit
137438953472 bytes
execution host
n063.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space
Zantema_06
run statistics
property
value
solver
AProVE21
configuration
standard
runtime (wallclock)
7.69275784492 seconds
cpu usage
27.069764894
max memory
1.509953536E9
stage attributes
key
value
output-size
4903
starexec-result
YES
output
/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: c69e44bd14796315568835c1ffa2502984884775 mhark 20210624 unpublished Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 82 ms] (2) QTRS (3) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) MRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 106 ms] (6) QDP (7) QDPOrderProof [EQUIVALENT, 228 ms] (8) QDP (9) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) TRUE ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(a(b(b(x1))))) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> a(a(a(b(a(a(a(x1))))))) a(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(x1)) b(b(x1)) -> a(b(a(x1))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]: POL(a(x_1)) = 1 + x_1 POL(b(x_1)) = 3 + x_1 With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: a(a(a(x1))) -> a(a(x1)) b(b(x1)) -> a(b(a(x1))) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(a(b(b(x1))))) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> a(a(a(b(a(a(a(x1))))))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: A(a(a(b(b(x1))))) -> B(b(b(x1))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(a(a(b(a(a(a(x1))))))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(a(b(a(a(a(x1)))))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(b(a(a(a(x1))))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> B(a(a(a(x1)))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(a(a(x1))) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(a(x1)) B(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> A(x1) The TRS R consists of the following rules: a(a(a(b(b(x1))))) -> b(b(b(x1))) b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) -> a(a(a(b(a(a(a(x1))))))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT) By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
popout
output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.
job log
popout
actions
all output
return to SRS Standard