details

property	value
status	complete
benchmark	Ex2_Luc02a_L.xml
ran by	Akihisa Yamada
cpu timeout	1200 seconds
wallclock timeout	300 seconds
memory limit	137438953472 bytes
execution host	n175.star.cs.uiowa.edu
space	Transformed_CSR_04

run statistics

property	value
solver	NTI_23
configuration	default
runtime (wallclock)	0.211008071899 seconds
cpu usage	0.28394117
max memory	3.897344E7

stage attributes

key	value
output-size	2609
starexec-result	"YES"

output

/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES ** BEGIN proof argument ** All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. ** END proof argument ** ** BEGIN proof description ** ## Searching for a generalized rewrite rule (a rule whose right-hand side contains a variable that does not occur in the left-hand side)... No generalized rewrite rule found! ## Applying the DP framework... ## 3 initial DP problems to solve. ## First, we try to decompose these problems into smaller problems. ## Round 1 [3 DP problems]: ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [sqr^#(s(_0)) -> sqr^#(_0)] TRS = {terms(_0) -> cons(recip(sqr(_0))), sqr(0) -> 0, sqr(s(_0)) -> s(add(sqr(_0),dbl(_0))), dbl(0) -> 0, dbl(s(_0)) -> s(s(dbl(_0))), add(0,_0) -> _0, add(s(_0),_1) -> s(add(_0,_1)), first(0,_0) -> nil, first(s(_0),cons(_1)) -> cons(_1)} ## DP Processor: homeomorphic embeddings. Using no argument filtering, i.e., applying the processor to the full problem only. Success, finiteness proved! This DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [dbl^#(s(_0)) -> dbl^#(_0)] TRS = {terms(_0) -> cons(recip(sqr(_0))), sqr(0) -> 0, sqr(s(_0)) -> s(add(sqr(_0),dbl(_0))), dbl(0) -> 0, dbl(s(_0)) -> s(s(dbl(_0))), add(0,_0) -> _0, add(s(_0),_1) -> s(add(_0,_1)), first(0,_0) -> nil, first(s(_0),cons(_1)) -> cons(_1)} ## DP Processor: homeomorphic embeddings. Using no argument filtering, i.e., applying the processor to the full problem only. Success, finiteness proved! This DP problem is finite. ## DP problem: Dependency pairs = [add^#(s(_0),_1) -> add^#(_0,_1)] TRS = {terms(_0) -> cons(recip(sqr(_0))), sqr(0) -> 0, sqr(s(_0)) -> s(add(sqr(_0),dbl(_0))), dbl(0) -> 0, dbl(s(_0)) -> s(s(dbl(_0))), add(0,_0) -> _0, add(s(_0),_1) -> s(add(_0,_1)), first(0,_0) -> nil, first(s(_0),cons(_1)) -> cons(_1)} ## DP Processor: homeomorphic embeddings. Using no argument filtering, i.e., applying the processor to the full problem only. Success, finiteness proved! This DP problem is finite. ## All the DP problems were proved finite. As all the involved DP processors are sound, the TRS under analysis terminates. Proof run on Linux version 3.10.0-1160.62.1.el7.x86_64 for amd64 using Java version 1.8.0_322 ** END proof description ** Total number of generated unfolded rules = 0 popout

output may be truncated. 'popout' for the full output.

job log

popout

actions

all output return to TRS Standard