/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_FirstOrder /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES We consider the system theBenchmark. We are asked to determine termination of the following first-order TRS. f : [o] --> o g : [o * o] --> o h : [o * o] --> o h(f(X), Y) => f(g(X, Y)) g(X, Y) => h(X, Y) As the system is orthogonal, it is terminating if it is innermost terminating by [Gra95]. Then, by [FuhGieParSchSwi11], it suffices to prove (innermost) termination of the typed system, with sort annotations chosen to respect the rules, as follows: f : [v] --> v g : [v * i] --> v h : [v * i] --> v We use rule removal, following [Kop12, Theorem 2.23]. This gives the following requirements (possibly using Theorems 2.25 and 2.26 in [Kop12]): h(f(X), Y) >? f(g(X, Y)) g(X, Y) >? h(X, Y) We orient these requirements with a polynomial interpretation in the natural numbers. The following interpretation satisfies the requirements: f = \y0.2 + y0 g = \y0y1.2 + y1 + 2y0 h = \y0y1.1 + y1 + 2y0 Using this interpretation, the requirements translate to: [[h(f(_x0), _x1)]] = 5 + x1 + 2x0 > 4 + x1 + 2x0 = [[f(g(_x0, _x1))]] [[g(_x0, _x1)]] = 2 + x1 + 2x0 > 1 + x1 + 2x0 = [[h(_x0, _x1)]] We can thus remove the following rules: h(f(X), Y) => f(g(X, Y)) g(X, Y) => h(X, Y) All rules were succesfully removed. Thus, termination of the original system has been reduced to termination of the beta-rule, which is well-known to hold. +++ Citations +++ [FuhGieParSchSwi11] C. Fuhs, J. Giesl, M. Parting, P. Schneider-Kamp, and S. Swiderski. Proving Termination by Dependency Pairs and Inductive Theorem Proving. In volume 47(2) of Journal of Automated Reasoning. 133--160, 2011. [Gra95] B. Gramlich. Abstract Relations Between Restricted Termination and Confluence Properties of Rewrite Systems. In volume 24(1-2) of Fundamentae Informaticae. 3--23, 1995. [Kop12] C. Kop. Higher Order Termination. PhD Thesis, 2012.