/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO proof of /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be disproven: (0) QTRS (1) DependencyPairsProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (2) QDP (3) DependencyGraphProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QDP (5) UsableRulesProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) QDP (7) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (8) QDP (9) TransformationProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (10) QDP (11) NonTerminationLoopProof [COMPLETE, 0 ms] (12) NO ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: cons(x, cons(y, z)) -> big inf(x) -> cons(x, inf(s(x))) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT) Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem. ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: INF(x) -> CONS(x, inf(s(x))) INF(x) -> INF(s(x)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: cons(x, cons(y, z)) -> big inf(x) -> cons(x, inf(s(x))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT) The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node. ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: INF(x) -> INF(s(x)) The TRS R consists of the following rules: cons(x, cons(y, z)) -> big inf(x) -> cons(x, inf(s(x))) Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (5) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT) We can use the usable rules and reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with the Ce-compatible extension of the polynomial order that maps every function symbol to the sum of its arguments. Then, we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R. ---------------------------------------- (6) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: INF(x) -> INF(s(x)) R is empty. Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (7) TransformationProof (EQUIVALENT) By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule INF(x) -> INF(s(x)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]: (INF(s(z0)) -> INF(s(s(z0))),INF(s(z0)) -> INF(s(s(z0)))) ---------------------------------------- (8) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: INF(s(z0)) -> INF(s(s(z0))) R is empty. Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (9) TransformationProof (EQUIVALENT) By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule INF(s(z0)) -> INF(s(s(z0))) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]: (INF(s(s(z0))) -> INF(s(s(s(z0)))),INF(s(s(z0))) -> INF(s(s(s(z0))))) ---------------------------------------- (10) Obligation: Q DP problem: The TRS P consists of the following rules: INF(s(s(z0))) -> INF(s(s(s(z0)))) R is empty. Q is empty. We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains. ---------------------------------------- (11) NonTerminationLoopProof (COMPLETE) We used the non-termination processor [FROCOS05] to show that the DP problem is infinite. Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly. s = INF(s(s(z0))) evaluates to t =INF(s(s(s(z0)))) Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions: * Matcher: [z0 / s(z0)] * Semiunifier: [ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rewriting sequence The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from INF(s(s(z0))) to INF(s(s(s(z0)))). ---------------------------------------- (12) NO