/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/starexec_run_standard /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- YES proof of /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml # AProVE Commit ID: 48fb2092695e11cc9f56e44b17a92a5f88ffb256 marcel 20180622 unpublished dirty Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven: (0) QTRS (1) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 85 ms] (2) QTRS (3) QTRSRRRProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (4) QTRS (5) RisEmptyProof [EQUIVALENT, 0 ms] (6) YES ---------------------------------------- (0) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: p(s(x)) -> x s(p(x)) -> x +(0, y) -> y +(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y)) +(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y)) minus(0) -> 0 minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x)) minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x)) *(0, y) -> 0 *(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y) *(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (1) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: p/1(YES) s/1(YES) +/2(YES,YES) 0/0) minus/1)YES( */2(YES,YES) Quasi precedence: *_2 > +_2 > [p_1, s_1] > 0 Status: p_1: multiset status s_1: multiset status +_2: multiset status 0: multiset status *_2: multiset status With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: p(s(x)) -> x s(p(x)) -> x +(0, y) -> y +(s(x), y) -> s(+(x, y)) +(p(x), y) -> p(+(x, y)) *(0, y) -> 0 *(s(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), y) *(p(x), y) -> +(*(x, y), minus(y)) ---------------------------------------- (2) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: The TRS R consists of the following rules: minus(0) -> 0 minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x)) minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x)) Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (3) QTRSRRRProof (EQUIVALENT) Used ordering: Knuth-Bendix order [KBO] with precedence:minus_1 > p_1 > 0 > s_1 and weight map: 0=1 minus_1=2 s_1=1 p_1=1 The variable weight is 1With this ordering the following rules can be removed by the rule removal processor [LPAR04] because they are oriented strictly: minus(0) -> 0 minus(s(x)) -> p(minus(x)) minus(p(x)) -> s(minus(x)) ---------------------------------------- (4) Obligation: Q restricted rewrite system: R is empty. Q is empty. ---------------------------------------- (5) RisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT) The TRS R is empty. Hence, termination is trivially proven. ---------------------------------------- (6) YES