/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_default /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


YES

Problem 1: 

(VAR x y)
(RULES
minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
minus(x,0) -> x
quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
)

Problem 1: 

Innermost Equivalent Processor:
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
-> The term rewriting system is non-overlaping or locally confluent overlay system. Therefore, innermost termination implies termination.
 

Problem 1: 

Dependency Pairs Processor:
-> Pairs:
 MINUS(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x,y),s(y))
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))

Problem 1: 

SCC Processor:
-> Pairs:
 MINUS(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x,y),s(y))
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
->Strongly Connected Components:
->->Cycle:
->->-> Pairs:
 MINUS(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
->->-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
->->Cycle:
->->-> Pairs:
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x,y),s(y))
->->-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))


The problem is decomposed in 2 subproblems.

Problem 1.1: 

Subterm Processor:
-> Pairs:
 MINUS(s(x),s(y)) -> MINUS(x,y)
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
->Projection:
 pi(MINUS) = 1

Problem 1.1: 

SCC Processor:
-> Pairs:
 Empty
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
->Strongly Connected Components:
 There is no strongly connected component

The problem is finite.

Problem 1.2: 

Reduction Pairs Processor:
-> Pairs:
 QUOT(s(x),s(y)) -> QUOT(minus(x,y),s(y))
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
-> Usable rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
->Interpretation type:
 Linear
->Coefficients:
 Natural Numbers
->Dimension:
 1
->Bound:
 2
->Interpretation:
 
[minus](X1,X2) = 2.X1 + 1
[0] = 0
[s](X) = 2.X + 2
[QUOT](X1,X2) = 2.X1

Problem 1.2: 

SCC Processor:
-> Pairs:
 Empty
-> Rules:
 minus(s(x),s(y)) -> minus(x,y)
 minus(x,0) -> x
 quot(0,s(y)) -> 0
 quot(s(x),s(y)) -> s(quot(minus(x,y),s(y)))
->Strongly Connected Components:
 There is no strongly connected component

The problem is finite.