/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/starexec_run_FirstOrder /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.xml /export/starexec/sandbox2/output/output_files -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYBE We consider the system theBenchmark. We are asked to determine termination of the following first-order TRS. 0 : [] --> o false : [] --> o id : [o] --> o if!6220mod : [o * o * o * o * o] --> o if2 : [o * o * o * o] --> o if3 : [o * o * o] --> o le : [o * o] --> o minus : [o * o] --> o mod : [o * o] --> o s : [o] --> o true : [] --> o zero : [o] --> o le(0, X) => true le(s(X), 0) => false le(s(X), s(Y)) => le(X, Y) zero(0) => true zero(s(X)) => false id(0) => 0 id(s(X)) => s(id(X)) minus(X, 0) => X minus(s(X), s(Y)) => minus(X, Y) mod(X, Y) => if!6220mod(zero(X), zero(Y), le(Y, X), id(X), id(Y)) if!6220mod(true, X, Y, Z, U) => 0 if!6220mod(false, X, Y, Z, U) => if2(X, Y, Z, U) if2(true, X, Y, Z) => 0 if2(false, X, Y, Z) => if3(X, Y, Z) if3(true, X, Y) => mod(minus(X, Y), s(Y)) if3(false, X, Y) => X As the system is orthogonal, it is terminating if it is innermost terminating by [Gra95]. Then, by [FuhGieParSchSwi11], it suffices to prove (innermost) termination of the typed system, with sort annotations chosen to respect the rules, as follows: 0 : [] --> xe false : [] --> yc id : [xe] --> xe if!6220mod : [yc * yc * yc * xe * xe] --> xe if2 : [yc * yc * xe * xe] --> xe if3 : [yc * xe * xe] --> xe le : [xe * xe] --> yc minus : [xe * xe] --> xe mod : [xe * xe] --> xe s : [xe] --> xe true : [] --> yc zero : [xe] --> yc +++ Citations +++ [FuhGieParSchSwi11] C. Fuhs, J. Giesl, M. Parting, P. Schneider-Kamp, and S. Swiderski. Proving Termination by Dependency Pairs and Inductive Theorem Proving. In volume 47(2) of Journal of Automated Reasoning. 133--160, 2011. [Gra95] B. Gramlich. Abstract Relations Between Restricted Termination and Confluence Properties of Rewrite Systems. In volume 24(1-2) of Fundamentae Informaticae. 3--23, 1995.